<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>World Court &#8211; The Jesus Realm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-jesus-realm.com/wordpress/tag/world-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-jesus-realm.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>The Kingdom of Jesus Christ</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:24:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>NWO &#8211; World Court Introduction</title>
		<link>http://the-jesus-realm.com/wordpress/2013/04/26/nwo-world-court-update/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Anson Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[David Anson Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teachings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-jesus-realm.com/wordpress/?p=762</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Update: I have more postings to do regarding the &#8216;house of cards&#8217; that TULIP Calvinism doctrine is comprised of but considering that the blog is going to go on an extended hiatus for the Summer it seems like a better option to continue the Calvinism examination later in the coming Fall.  NWO &#8211; World Court&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update: I have more postings to do regarding the &#8216;house of cards&#8217; that TULIP Calvinism doctrine is comprised of but considering that the blog is going to go on an extended hiatus for the Summer it seems like a better option to continue the Calvinism examination later in the coming Fall.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"> <strong>NWO &#8211; World Court Introduction</strong></p>
<p>We are going to take a look and do some speculation regarding the coming NWO World Court System. The speculation is going to involve some possible scenarios regarding the NWO Bush family and it is not going to be very favorable of the Bush family, as many of the past postings have been critical of the Bush family, so don’t get offended if this is your fist time reading this material.</p>
<p>This material for the most part has already been posted as article postings <a href="http://www.basicchristian.org/frame_News-Info-BasicChristian.html" target="_blank">here</a> and <a href="http://www.basicchristian.org/frame_War_Iraq.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Summary: </strong>The current fledgling International Court of Justice (ICJ) system has two notable problems first it’s obscure and distant location in The Hague (Netherlands) and second it lacks a truly high profile, global case.</p>
<p>The possibility exists that the International Court of Justice (ICJ) system would need to be relocated first to then be brought into a global prominence. A city like London, England would be a more suited and more centralized location for the ICJ to operate.</p>
<p>Speculating that the year 2013 would be a foundational year for the NWO there are two days of Friday the 13th in 2013, September 13th and December 13th – as the current Catholic Jesuit Pope Francis [received his ordination on Saturday Dec. 13, 1969] was elected in 2013 the foundation of the ICJ might truly be established [i.e. in London] as well in 2013.</p>
<p>The ICJ would never truly be substantial without some high profile cases and it isn&#8217;t difficult to speculate that former President George W. Bush at some point might have to take a break from painting his toes and make a long journey to the ICJ to answer some questions.</p>
<p>Further it would also be politically plausible that former British Prime Minister Tony Blair would make the same long trip to the ICJ that Bush Jr. might make and interestingly enough biblically [invoking ancient OT spirits (Joshua 6:26, 1 Kings 16:34) Jericho lit. &#8220;City of the Moon&#8221;] it would be spiritual if Jeb Bush had a part (political office) in the ICJ, spiritual [demonic] because in reality George Bush Sr. has dedicated his entire adult life to the rebuilding an Arab &#8220;City of the Moon&#8221; NWO.</p>
<p>CNN 04-25-2013: <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/04/25/barbara-bush-on-jeb-in-2016-weve-had-enough-bushes/" target="_blank">Barbara Bush on Jeb in 2016: &#8216;We&#8217;ve had enough Bushes&#8217;</a></p>
<blockquote><p>(CNN) – While former President George W. Bush says he wants his brother Jeb to run for president in 2016, their always-blunt mother said Thursday she feels differently.  “He&#8217;s by far the best qualified man, but no. I really don&#8217;t,” she said when asked if her son, the former Florida governor, will make a White House bid. &#8230; Her comments came Thursday morning on NBC’s “Today,” as the former first lady sat alongside former first lady Laura Bush and Bush 43’s twin daughters, Jenna Bush Hager (a correspondent for NBC) and Barbara Bush. The three generations were together for the George W. Bush Presidential Center dedication ceremony in Dallas. &#8230;“He’s the most qualified but I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;ll run,” Barbara Bush added.</p></blockquote>
<p>George Washington University &#8211; <a href="http://www.gwu.edu/~erpapers/teachinger/glossary/world-court.cfm" target="_blank">World Court</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The Permanent Court of International Justice (ICJ), commonly known as the World Court, was first proposed during discussions involving the Treaty of Versailles as an effective replacement for the ineffective Hague Tribunal. Article 14 of the Covenant of the League of Nations instructed the leadership of the league to design a Permanent Court of International Justice &#8220;competent to hear and determine any dispute of an international character which the parties thereto submit to it&#8221; and capable of giving &#8220;an advisory opinion upon any dispute or question referred to it by the Council or by the Assembly.&#8221;</p>
<p>The World Court opened its doors in 1921 after the Covenant of the League of Nations [the WWI formed League of Nations at the close of WWII was reformed into the UN] was ratified by forty-two nations (sixty-three governments would join the league before its demise in 1946). President Woodrow Wilson, despite his passionate efforts, failed to convince the Senate to ratify the treaty; therefore, the United States would not be a member of the league or the court.</p>
<p><a href="http://library.gwu.edu/collections/digitize/partners/georgetown-university-1" target="_blank">Correction</a>: George Washington University partner Georgetown University is the Jesuit University &#8212; Georgetown University is the oldest and largest Catholic and Jesuit university in America, founded in 1789 by Archbishop John Carroll. Georgetown today is a major student-centered, international, research university offering respected undergraduate, graduate and professional programs in Washington, DC, Doha, Qatar and around the world. For more information about Georgetown University, visit http://www.georgetown.edu.</p></blockquote>
<p>International Court of Justice <a href="http://www.icj-cij.org/court/index.php?p1=1" target="_blank">Website</a></p>
<h4>The Court</h4>
<div id="divHtml">
<style><!--
#divHtml a:link,#divHtml a:visited,#divHtml a:active {font-weight: bold !important;}
--></style>
<p>The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations (UN). It was established in June 1945 by the Charter of the United Nations and began work in April 1946.</p>
<p><strong>The seat of the Court is at the Peace Palace in The Hague (Netherlands).</strong> Of the six principal organs of the United Nations, it is the only one not located in New York (United States of America).</p>
<p>The Court’s role is to settle, in accordance with international law, legal disputes submitted to it by States and to give advisory opinions on legal questions referred to it by authorized United Nations organs and specialized agencies.</p>
<p>The Court is composed of 15 judges, who are elected for terms of office of nine years by the United Nations General Assembly and the Security Council. It is assisted by a Registry, its administrative organ. Its official languages are English and French.</p>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Note: these are very difficult topics to consider but keep in mind that just since 2001 the world has changed dramatically and it is going to continue to change even more dramatically.</p>
<p>God bless everyone,<br />
David Anson Brown</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Four Dispensations  of The Bible’s New Testament</title>
		<link>http://the-jesus-realm.com/wordpress/2013/01/23/the-four-dispensations-of-the-bibles-new-testament/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Anson Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[David Anson Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Devotional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-jesus-realm.com/wordpress/?p=310</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Summary: The Apostle Paul&#8217;s Journey to Rome &#8211; The Four Dispensations of the Times since the 1st Coming of Jesus Christ seem to have been mapped out and enacted throughout Paul&#8217;s Journey to Rome &#8212; 1. The Apostles Dispensation (Acts 27:1-5) &#8212; 2. The Common Christian Church Age (Acts 27:6-44) &#8212; 3. The Martyred Saints&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Summary:</strong> The Apostle Paul&#8217;s Journey to Rome &#8211; The Four Dispensations of the Times since the 1st Coming of Jesus Christ seem to have been mapped out and enacted throughout Paul&#8217;s Journey to Rome &#8212; 1. The Apostles Dispensation (Acts 27:1-5) &#8212; 2. The Common Christian Church Age (Acts 27:6-44) &#8212; 3. The Martyred Saints of Revelation Tribulation (Acts 28:1-15) &#8212; 4. The 1,000 year Millennial Kingdom Reign of Jesus Christ on earth (Acts 28:16-31)</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>1. The Apostles Dispensation (Acts 27:1-5): Paul and the other Apostles [eyewitnesses] of Jesus Christ go into the world preaching the Gospel of the Kingdom of God in Jesus Christ. "Acts 27:3-5 And [representing the Apostolic Missionary Journey Age] the next day we touched at Sidon. And Julius courteously entreated Paul, and gave *him liberty to go unto his friends to refresh himself. And when we had launched from thence, we sailed under Cyprus, because the **winds were contrary. And when we had sailed over the sea of Cilicia and Pamphylia, we came to Myra, a city of Lycia." {Note: Luke and the Apostle Paul seem to be recording two primary things. 1. Looking back on all of Paul's Missionary Journeys that Paul felt that they had gone well and that on the whole the Gospel was being well received "him liberty to go unto his friends to refresh himself" that Paul had made a lot of friends on his Missionary Trips and was refreshed by the fellowship he had with the Gentile Christians. 2. Also noting that "the [spiritual] winds were contrary" seeming to imply that there was a great deal of spiritual (demonic) opposition to the Gospel Message going forward.} -- 2. The Common Christian Church Age (Acts 27:6-44): "Acts 27:6 And there the centurion found a ship of Alexandria sailing into Italy; and he put us therein." {Note: The ship of the Apostolic Age has ended and the ship of the Common Christian Church Age has launched - carrying the nourishing wheat (Bible) and the four anchors (4 Gospels). The [Christian] ship spends a great deal of time in the port of "Fair Havens" and then departs into adversity to the extent that the storms of life strand and tear the ship apart. Noteworthy, the Church [ship] has the four anchors [4 Gospels] and correctly uses them to stabilize the ship in dangerous waters however also note how the cargo of wheat [Bible] is considered too big of a burden and is cast overboard (Acts 27:38) away from the Church. -- 3. The Martyred Saints of Revelation Tribulation (Acts 28:1-15): After the Christian Church Age has come to an end the Revelation Tribulation Age begins. {Note: The Saints of Revelation are washed ashore into a strange society and economy where they are refuges; destitute and in peril. Though working hard and trying to get along they are Bitten by the Beast and transported to fellowship with their fellow Martyrs. -- 4. The 1,000 year Millennial Kingdom Reign of Jesus Christ on earth (Acts 27:16-31): Having finally arrived in Rome the Throne of the King the Millennial Rein of Jesus Christ is now being depicted. {Note: As a type of a citizen of the Millennial Reign of Jesus Christ, Paul is sent not to jail but to his own house to live [for two years]. Once in his Millennial House the Apostle Paul immediately begins to fellowship with the Jews of the Millennial Age.} -- Paul's Journey to Rome and the book of Acts concludes "Acts 28:30-31 And Paul dwelt two whole years in his own hired house, and received all that came in unto him, **Preaching the kingdom of God, and teaching those things which concern the Lord Jesus Christ, with all confidence, no man forbidding him." [<a href="http://www.basicchristian.org/frame_blog_historystudy.html">link</a>]</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In the Apostle Paul&#8217;s trip to Rome [recorded in the Bible&#8217;s Book of Acts by the early Church Historian Luke] are some of the most codded and cryptic passages of the Bible&#8217;s New Testament &#8211; Was Luke aided by the Apostle Paul, putting forth the future of the Church Era and an End Time scenario that Christians could glean from to understand events both current and future? &#8212; Coming Soon: Decoding The Apostle Paul&#8217;s Trip to Rome (Acts Chapters 27 and 28)</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>We will take a brief look at Acts chapters 27 and 28. Here are some of the very cryptic verses that possibly tell a parallel story [of the Church Age and End Times] to the story of Paul's voyage to Rome. -- "Acts 27:4 And when we had launched from thence, we sailed under Cyprus, because the winds were contrary." -- "Acts 27:6 And there the centurion found a ship of Alexandria sailing into Italy; and he put us therein." -- "Acts 27:9 Now when much time was spent, and when sailing was now dangerous, because the fast [Yom Kippur] was now already past, Paul admonished them," -- "Acts 27:14 But not long after there arose against it a tempestuous wind, called Euroclydon." -- "Acts 27:15-16 And when the ship was caught, and could not bear up into the wind, we let her drive. And running under a certain island which is called Clauda, we had much work to come by the boat:" -- "Acts 27:31 Paul said to the centurion and to the soldiers, Except these abide in the ship, ye cannot be saved." -- "Acts 27:29 Then fearing lest we should have fallen upon rocks, they cast four anchors out of the stern, and wished for the day." -- "Acts 28:3 And when Paul had gathered a bundle of sticks, and laid them on the fire, there came a viper out of the heat, and fastened on his hand." -- "Acts 28:5 And he shook off the beast [G2342 - Therion] into the fire, and felt no harm." -- "Acts 28:11 And after three months we departed in a ship of Alexandria, which had wintered in the isle, whose sign was [Gnosticism] Castor and Pollux." -- "Acts 28:15 And from thence, when the brethren heard of us, they came to meet us as far as Appii Forum, and The Three Taverns: whom when Paul saw, he </tt><tt>thanked God, and took courage."</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">JustBible.net: Bible Study of Acts Chapter 27 &#8211; How will you ride out your life&#8217;s next storm? {Note: there have been thousands of Sermons Preached on the very popular passages of Paul&#8217;s journey to Rome (Acts 27 and 28) and all of them allegorize to some extent the passages of the journey &#8211; most commonly the four anchors (of faith) are allegorized from Acts 27:31.}</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>Why were they to "sail to Italy" (Acts 27:1)? Paul had requested a trial before the Caesar, so he was being transported from Caesarea to Rome by ship. -- Who were being transported with Paul? Apparently, "we" (Acts 27:1) included **Luke, who wrote Acts and "Aristarchus" (Acts 27:2). Also sailing were "some other prisoners" (Acts 27:1) to be tried before Caesar and/or already tried, found guilty and sentenced to fight (to their death) in the coliseum of Rome. -- Who was "Aristarchus" (Acts 27:2)? Aristarchus was a "Macedonian of Thessalonica" (Acts 27:2) who was with Paul in Ephesus during the riot - "So the whole city was filled with confusion, and rushed into the theater with one accord, having seized Gaius and Aristarchus, Macedonians, Paul's travel companions" (Acts 19:29) - and apparently accompanied him to Greece, and from there to Jerusalem: "After the uproar had ceased, Paul called the disciples to himself, embraced them, and departed to go to Macedonia. Now when he had gone over that region and encouraged them with many words, he came to Greece and stayed three months. And when the Jews plotted against him as he was about to sail to Syria, he decided to return through Macedonia. And Sopater of Berea accompanied him to Asia - also Aristarchus and Secundus of the Thessalonians, and Gaius of Derbe, and Timothy, and Tychicus and Trophimus of Asia." (Acts 20:1-4) Two years later, Aristarchus, who may have spent those two years tending to Paul in Caesarea, was now accompanying him from Caesarea to Rome. Aristarchus was a Jew and remained with Paul during his imprisonment in Rome: "Aristarchus my fellow prisoner greets you, with Mark the cousin of Barnabas (about whom you received instructions: if he comes to you, welcome him), and Jesus who is called Justus. These are my only fellow workers for the kingdom of God who are of the circumcision; they have proved to be a comfort to me." (Colossians 4:10-11) ... [<a href="http://www.justbible.net/acts27-study.htm">link</a>]</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Grace Baptist Church: Sermon &#8211; &#8220;Four Anchors That Will Hold&#8221; Acts 27:29 &#8211; In this very popular portion of Scripture there are four anchors that will keep your Christian life right on course until you land safely on the other shore (Online Audio with PowerPoint &#8211; Text)</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>For the saved: are your anchors holding? Are they solid? Will they keep you from drifting out to sea? [<a href="http://www.gbcdecatur.org/sermons/4Anchors.html">link</a>]</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Warning!</strong> This is going to be a mostly allegorical look at parts of Acts chapters 27 and 28 &#8211; In this type of allegorizing it is going to be important to only give a secondary meaning to items in the passages that had that same secondary meaning back in Luke&#8217;s and Paul&#8217;s time when it was originally written and for instance not to say the Island of Crete represents Roman Catholicism because Crete didn&#8217;t represent that back in the day when the text was written</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>Note: Ancient Gnosticism is the even more ancient 'Double Star' false religion of Twins (Christ - Antichrist or Castor - Pollex) well known in Paul's day. It was probably the original Nimrod [Tower of Babel] deception religion [i.e. Tammuz] of Genesis 11 and is a well-established part of the 7 [Mystery Babylon] Gentile Kingdoms. -- Therefore allegorizing the sign of Castor and Pollex in Acts 28:11 as representing Gnosticism and other similar allegorizations are within the </tt><tt>scope and intent of this study.</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">{Flashback} Where is all this going in our day &#8211; Presumably back to Gnosticism (the original Nimrod occult replacement doctrine deception) &#8211; Gnosticism was also the primary deception [occult answer to the resurrection truth of Jesus Christ] able to be maintained as a viable deception (against Christianity) and hold its own in the early years of the new bright and shining N.T. Christian Church light and then with the passing of the original Church Apostles a modern (post-resurrection) Gnosticism was then able to take root and remain until our time &#8211; Gnosticism is in regards to who is the actual Christ (Jesus) and who is the actual Antichrist (Satan) &#8211; Are the two roles of God and Devil reversed as Gnosticism would portray</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>The Revised Roman Empire [Rome and whomever Rome (the Vatican) empowers (Revelation 17:13)] rose out of the earlier doctrines of Gnosticism and sustained itself until a modern (post-resurrection) Gnosticism could again became rooted and well established in human society. Following the resurrection of Jesus Christ and the New Christian Church eternal, resurrection, life in Jesus paradigm there was no Revised Roman Empire but eventually in the reconfigured (Jesus - Satan) [post-resurrection] doctrines of Gnosticism about 300 A.D. Revised Rome emerged. Gnosticism is the 'Double Star' Twins (Christ - Antichrist or Castor - Pollex) Nimrod deception religion of the 7 Gentile Kingdoms. -- Albert Pike (1809-1891) [Confederate Civil War General] said "three future world wars would prepare the world for the [Satanic] New World Order. ... (NWO) will receive the true light [Gnosticism] through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer [Satan], **brought finally out [of secrecy and into] in the public view, a manifestation (belief in Satanism) which will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the [Gnostic Satan is the christ] destruction [discrediting] of Christianity and atheism [all cults i.e. Mormon LDS , etc. and all false religions i.e. Islam, etc.], *both [Christianity and all non-Luciferianism] conquered [*after the rapture] and exterminated at the same time" - Albert Pike was actually addressing the teachings of French occultist Eliphas Levi. [Eliphas Lévi, born Alphonse Louis Constant, (1810-1875) was a French occult author and purported magician. "Eliphas Lévi" the name under which he published his books, was his attempt to translate or transliterate his given names "Alphonse Louis" into Hebrew although he was not Jewish. - Wiki.com] -- "Acts 28:11 And after three months we [Apostle Paul and Luke] departed [the island of Melita (Malta)] in a ship of Alexandria [a Greek colony in Egypt], which had wintered in the isle, *whose sign was Castor and Pollux (Gnosticism). And landing at Syracuse [in Sicily - 364 mi. south of Rome], we tarried [stayed] there three days." Was Luke embedding into his book of Acts for future Christian understanding the concept that Gnosticism and Christianity would be traveling companions on the high seas of history leading towards a final destination of Rome and the eventual End Time Revised Rome Empire! - Note: There is a current events (End Time) scenario in process regardless of how accurate or inaccurate Albert Pike was in his letters. The Albert Pike material is only being posted as reference material - in reference to a general End Time Gnostic plan and scenario and not as though Albert Pike was able to predict the future or affect future events in any sustainable</tt><tt> cohesive way.</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>A Timestamp?</strong> &#8211; Is Acts 27:16 a &#8216;Timestamp&#8217; used by Luke the same way Luke 2:1 and John 6:1 are Scriptural Timestamps? &#8212; Wikipedia.com: Roman Emperor Augustus (Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus) [Luke 2:1] Reign: 16 January 27 B.C. to 19 August 14 A.D. (40 years, 215 days) &#8212; Roman Emperor Tiberius (Tiberius Julius Caesar Augustus) [John 6:1] Reign: 18 September 14 A.D. to 16 March 37 A.D. (22 years, 179 days) &#8212; Roman Emperor Caligula (Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus Germanicus) Reign: 16 March 37 A.D. to 24 January 41 A.D. (3 years, 314 days) &#8212; Roman Emperor Claudius (Tiberius Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus) [Acts 27:16?] Reign: 24 January 41 A.D. to 13 October 54 A.D. (13 years, 262 days) &#8212; Roman Emperor Nero (Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus) Reign: 13 October 54 A.D. to 9 June 68 A.D. (13 years, 240 days) &#8212; Empress of Rome Claudia Octavia [daughter of the Emperor Claudius, and stepsister and first wife of the Emperor Nero] [Acts 27:16?] &#8211; Tenure (as Empress of Rome): 13 October 54 A.D. &#8211; 62 A.D. (8 years) &#8212; &#8220;Acts 27:16 And running under a certain island which is called Clauda [possibly named after Roman Emperor Claudius or Empress of Rome Claudia Octavia (first wife of Roman Emperor Nero)], we had much work to come by the boat:&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>During the Roman Reign (6th Kingdom) the sea of Galilee was renamed to the sea of Tiberias in honor of the Roman Emperor Tiberius "John 6:1 After these things Jesus went over the sea of Galilee, which is the sea of Tiberias." -- It is possible that the small island Clauda (modern Gavdos) was also named after a Roman figure namely Roman Emperor Claudius [41 A.D. - 54 A.D.] or Claudia Octavia (first wife of Roman Emperor Nero) [54 A.D. - 62 A.D.]. Luke recording that they were "running under a certain island which is called Clauda" could Luke have been recording a substantial timestamp for the voyage of the Apostle Paul to Rome with the voyage "running under" occurring while Roman Emperor Claudius or Empress Claudia Octavia were in power sometime between 41 A.D. and 62 A.D. most likely occurring between 54 A.D. to 62 A.D. [Traditional Church History places Paul's voyage to Rome at 60 A.D. (departing Caesarea) and 61 A.D. (arrivin</tt><tt>g in Rome)].</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Acts and Mission 96 &#8211; We&#8217;re skipping quickly through the journey narratives of Acts because our focus is on Paul&#8217;s missional work and missional theology, and traveling [Fair Havens to the right] &#8230; well it&#8217;s part of it because missional people travel &#8211; Paul gets an opportunity [to share his faith] because he predicts disaster, and disaster comes; he gets more opportunity because of healing &#8230; he takes his chances &#8211; But this shipwreck story is a gem of a story and so I&#8217;ll post the whole thing today: Paul and Company Sail for Rome (Acts 27:1-28:10)</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>Comment: 1. I confess that unfortunately, I've not kept up with this series. Just dropping in on this story, **it surprises me not to find Paul using some object lesson to give the gospel (Acts 27:1-28:10). He interacts with middle management, ha ha, lives through the resulting crash, comes up on shore, gets bitten, “he's a murderer!”, “nope, he's a god!”, heals a bunch of people and everyone likes them and the ship's company sails away. **Ironic, humorous, tense, unusual - but no account of the presentation of the gospel, nobody saved. Where is the altar-to-the-unknown-god (Acts 17:23) object lesson? **I feel somewhat unfulfilled! Looking up some comments online, I see some hints of a Greek/Roman hero surviving a storm and shipwreck (but by God's protection). The healing is evidence of God's power. Interesting to think about how this story moves Luke's plot forward. **I see that while I knew this story, **I don't know this story. If I knew any Greek scholars, I'd ask 'em to tell me more about this account... Comment by Matthew S - February 18, 2010 {Note: There just seems from a Biblical perspective to be more to the events than a first reading would indicate. The events in Acts 27 would be a fine factual informative narrative for a newspaper accounting but being a Biblical [eternal, life changing] accounting the significant details of this event might just have been redirected and interspersed into the background events of Paul's voyage.} [<a href="http://www.patheos.com/community/jesuscreed/2010/02/18/acts-and-mission-96/">link</a>]</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Four Anchors Are Found From the Apostle Paul&#8217;s Ship Near Malta &#8211; The four anchors, which are [in] the Malta Maritime Museum today (YouTube)</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>This is old news, but I wanted to upload this for Biblical and historical purposes. The 4 anchors were found off Malta (Acts 28:1), which are believed to be the same four anchors that were released into the sea (Acts 27:40), from the ship Paul was sailing on, that went through a destructive storm (Acts 27). The four anchors, which are the Malta Maritime Museum today, is evidence for the historical event that Paul the apostle, and the other 275 persons (Acts 27:37) went through, as mentioned in the Holy Bible. [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgGfm5cVr8Y">link</a>]</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Paul&#8217;s Shipwreck DVD Trailer (YouTube)</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>This is a journey to the discovery of the 4 anchors from Apostle Paul's Shipwreck off the coast of Malta in the Mediterranean Sea in the year 60 AD. The full DVD will be available early in 2011. Visit baseinstitute.org for more info. [<a href="http://youtu.be/CRFj9wWMonc">link</a>]</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Four Anchors [Four Gospels] and Three Taverns [Triune God] &#8211; By Luke taking the time to narrate (Acts 27:29) specifically that exactly four anchors were used to steady the one boat of &#8216;salvation&#8217; (Acts 27:31) apparently Luke as one of the four Gospel writers [Gospel of Luke] was clarifying for the Christian Church that there were to be exactly four Gospels [Matthew, Mark, Luke and John] in the Holy Bible for the one Christian Church. &#8211; Setting: At this late (Acts 27-28) stage of the Apostle Paul&#8217;s ministry as an Apostle to the young Christian primarily Gentile Church the Apostle Paul, Luke and others had already traveled many of the roads of known civilization and had encountered many of the perils of delivering the Gospel Message to an unbelieving world. Paul and Luke knowing that they were not long for this world [Paul was in route to Rome and his eventual martyrdom] possibly wanted to leave a young Christian Church with some easily perceivable proof texts that would help stabilize and guide the newly formed Gentile portion of the Christian Church.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>In this seemingly straightforward narration of events in Acts 27 and 28 Luke was quick to write of the necessity of four anchors [four Gospels] being needed to steady the one boat of salvation (Acts 27:31) and later "The Three Taverns" (Acts 28:15) of the Triune (Trinity) nature of God as Jesus had taught the Apostles in the Gospel of John "John 14:1-2 Let not your heart be troubled: ye **believe in God (Father, Holy Spirit), **believe also in Me (Jesus). In My Father's House [i.e. Tavern] are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you." - Note: Luke is thought to have written the third of four Gospels though possibly the Gospel of John had already been written or Paul and Luke already knew of the intentions and calling of John to write his Gospel. - It is often taught that the Gospel of John was written after the Book of Revelation was written [also by John] but that is only because the styles of the two books [Gospel of John and the Book of Revelation] are so different that some people teach that Revelation preceded the Gospel of John though in actuality the Gospel of John probably preceded the Book of Revelation by a long time. -- {Briefly: The Greek (text) sentences in the Book of Revelation are very rudimentary while the Greek sentences in the Gospel of John are much more refined and common so some say that Revelation was written first [supposedly while John learned Greek] even though John used scribes [Greek scholars] and had a different scribe for each Book and also had two different purposes [and audiences] for each book. The Book of Revelation is the one book in the Bible that is a better version in the English language rather than in the original Hebrew [O.T.] or Greek [N.T.] languages. It is as though the Book of Revelation was originally intended to be written in English and happened to be written in Greek just until the introduction of the English language could be established at the coming End Times of the world. While the Gospel of John was clearly written to be read and understood within the days it was written. The Book of Revelation was clearly delayed in significance until its transla</tt><tt>tion into the English language.</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">When were the [four] gospels written and by whom? &#8211; None of the gospels mention the destruction of the Jewish temple in 70 A.D. &#8211; This is significant because Jesus had prophesied [the destruction of the Temple (Matthew 24:2)] concerning the temple -This prophecy was fulfilled in 70 A.D. when the Romans sacked Jerusalem and burned the temple {Very possibly dating the writing of the Gospel of John to before 70 A.D. Possibly the Gospel of John was written in about 60 A.D. [in Jerusalem] to about 65 A.D. at about the same time of the writing of the Gospel of Luke [written probably about 59 A.D. in Jerusalem or as late as 60 A.D. in Caesarea] and the Book of Acts [probably written about 63 A.D. in Rome].}</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>Matthew: The early church unanimously held that the gospel of Matthew was **the first written gospel and was penned by the apostle of the same name (Matt. 10:2-4). Lately, the priority of Matthew as the first written gospel has come under suspicion with Mark being considered by many to be the first written gospel. The debate is far from over. The historian Papias [According to the 2nd-century theologian Irenaeus, Papias had known the Apostle John - Source: britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/442073/Papias] mentions that the gospel of Matthew was originally in Aramaic or **Hebrew and attributes the gospel to Matthew the apostle. "Irenaeus (ca. A.D. 180) continued Papias's views about Matthew and Mark and added his belief that Luke, the follower of Paul, put down in a book the gospel preached by that apostle, and that John, the Beloved Disciple, published his Gospel while residing in Asia [city of Ephesus]." ... John: The writer of the gospel of John was obviously an eyewitness of the events of Christ's life since he speaks from a perspective of having been there during many of the events of Jesus' ministry and displays a good knowledge of Israeli geography and customs. The John Rylands papyrus [Bible] fragment 52 of John's gospel dated in the year 135 contains portions of John 18, verses 31-33,37-38. This [Bible] fragment was found **in Egypt and a considerable amount of time is needed for the circulation of the gospel before it reached Egypt. It [John] is the last of the gospels and appears to have been written in the 80's to 90's. **Of important note is the lack of mention of the destruction of the Jewish temple in 70 A.D. But this is understandable since John was not focusing on historical events. Instead, he focused on the theological aspect of the person of Christ and listed His miracles and words that affirmed Christ's deity. Though there is still some debate on the dates of when the gospels were written, they were most assuredly completed before the close of the first century and written by eyewitnesses or under the direction of eyewitnesses. [<a href="http://carm.org/when-were-gospels-written-and-by-whom">link</a>]</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Papias Wrote from 100-125 A.D. The books &#8220;Expositions of the Sayings of the Lord&#8221; &#8211; Papias was the Bishop of Hierapolis in Phyrgia [about 130 A.D.] &#8211; He was born probably between 70 and 75 A.D., and died, perhaps, 163 A.D. (earlychurch.org.uk/papias.php) &#8211; {Note: The first generation or two of Church leaders, bishops and writers after the Apostles are known as the &#8220;Church Fathers&#8221; [i.e. Irenaeus] and apparently if they were actually a disciple of one of the Apostles [i.e. Papias (70-163 A.D.) and Saint Polycarp (69-155 A.D.)] they instead were called an &#8220;Apostolic Father.&#8221;}</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>Papias is commonly classed as an Apostolic Father, **meaning that he knew the Apostles themselves [claimed to have known John and Mark], or at least lived in the generation following their deaths. He wrote five books and in them recounted unknown teachings of Jesus, miraculous stories about the Apostles, discussed the authorship of some of the Gospels, and also quoted from other parts of the New Testament. Unfortunately his writings have been lost except for the fragments given below. -- In the print world, Michael Holmes has published a popular and good quality English translation of Papias in The Apostolic Fathers: Greek Texts and English Translations, however it has a few mistakes and omits some fragments, all of which I have attempted to correct on this page. While assembling these fragments, I have used the translations of Lightfoot and the Nicene and Post-Nicene Church Father Series. These are good English translations and are in the public domain. I have only changed punctuation or a word here and there, in order to make the translation better fit our modern vernacular. [<a href="http://www.chronicon.net/index.php/papias">link</a>]</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">EarlyChristianWritings.com: Gospel of John &#8211; Estimated Range of Dating: 90-120 A.D. &#8211; Helms states, &#8220;we need to note that part of the purpose of Irenaeus was to attack the teachings of Cerinthus, a *gnostic [Castor &#8211; Pollex] [false] Christian teacher who *lived in Ephesus at the end of the first century&#8221; &#8211; **Cerinthus was &#8220;educated in the wisdom of [Alexandria] the Egyptians &#8212; [Irenaeus an early Church Father: born about 135 A.D. &#8211; died in 202 A.D. &#8211; During the persecution of Emperor Marcus Aurelius, the Roman Emperor from 161-180, Irenaeus was a priest of the Church of Lyon, France &#8211; Wikipedia.org]</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>Helms states, "we need to note that part of the purpose of Irenaeus was to attack the teachings of Cerinthus, a gnostic Christian teacher who lived in Ephesus at the end of the first century" (op. cit., p. 162). Cerinthus was "educated in the wisdom of the Egyptians, [Gnosticism] taught that the world was not made by a primary God [God the Father], **but [instead] by a certain Power [Satan] far separated from him...Moreover, after [Jesus'] baptism, Christ descended upon him in the form of a dove from [Satan] the Supreme Ruler, and that then he proclaimed the unknown Father [Satan], and performed miracles. **But at last Christ departed from Jesus, and that then Jesus suffered and rose again, while Christ remained impassible, inasmuch as he was a spiritual being" (1.26.1). ***Irenaeus stated that the purpose of John at Ephesus was as follows: **by the proclamation of the Gospel, **to remove that [Gnostic] error which by Cerinthus [and others] had been disseminated among men, and **a long time previously by those termed **Nicolaitans (Revelation 2:6), who are an offset of that 'knowledge' [gnosis] falsely so called, that he might confound them, and persuade them that there is but one God, who made all things by His Word; and not, as they allege, that the Creator was one [different god], but the Father and the Lord another; and that the Son of the Creator was, forsooth (really), one, but the Christ from above another (3.11.1) -- Helms argues: "So the gospel attributed, late in the second century, to John at Ephesus was viewed as an anti-gnostic, anti-Cerinthean work. But, very strangely, Epiphanius, in his book against the heretics, argues against those who actually believed that it was Cerinthus himself who wrote the Gospel of John! (Adv. Haer. 51.3.6). How could it be that the Fourth Gospel was at one time in its history regarded as the product of an Egyptian-trained gnostic, and at another time in its history regarded as composed for the very purpose of attacking this same gnostic? I think the answer is plausible that in an early, now-lost version, the Fourth Gospel could well have been read in a Cerinthean, gnostic fashion, but that at Ephesus a revision of it was produced (we now call it the Gospel of John) that put this gospel back into the Christian mainstream." {Note: Possibly in about 59 A.D. when the Apostle Paul visited Jerusalem and *reported from his Missionary journeys to the Gentiles [including to Ephesus] one of the main topics would have been the often encountered opposition of Gnosticism [in Ephesus]. Wanting to counter Gnosticism John might have made it known then that he would [visit Ephesus] and write an epistle [Gospel] to confront Gnosticism. Presumably, the Gospel of John was first discussed in Jerusalem among John, Paul and all the other Apostles and was also written by John (John 21:24) in Jerusalem in about 60 A.D., written primarily to give faith to Christians (John 20:31). Then with a copy of the Gospel of John in hand the Apostle John set out to Ephesus to minister there. The point is that the Apostles were actually very connected, concerned, informed and determined in their mission and early Church calling that God had placed on their lives. -- "Acts 21:17-19 And when we [Paul, Luke and Aristarchus] were come to Jerusalem [about 59 or 60 A.D.], the brethren received us gladly. And the day following Paul went in with us unto James; and all the elders were present [including John (2 John 1:1)]. And when he had saluted them, he [Paul] declared particularly what things God had wrought among the Gentiles by his ministry."} [<a href="http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/john.html">link</a>]</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>A Mixed Race to Rome</strong> &#8211; The most often mentioned items in Luke&#8217;s shipwreck account are of Turkish [Persian influenced] towns, Greek Islands and Egyptian [Alexandrian] ships the influences of which are all being directed into Rome &#8211; {Note: Luke and Paul in recording the Book of Acts seem to be informing the young European Gentile Church that yes, Christianity has come to Europe, primarily in the form of Paul [a bound prisoner of Rome] and his two scraggly traveling companions [Luke and Aristarchus]. But to know for certain that also coming to Rome [Western Europe] are the forces of Egypt [Eastern Mysticism, Ancient Babylon Mystery Religion], Persian [eventually Islam] influences, Greek mythology, Malta mysticism and Gnostic heresy. Christianity would come to Europe and Europe would have an appearance of Christianity a veneer of Christianity but below the veneer would be a blend of *Mystery Babylon counter religions that the Christian Church would have to continually contend with.}</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>"Acts 27:5-6 And when we had sailed over the sea of Cilicia [region of Turkey near the crossroads of Western Asia and Eastern Europe] and Pamphylia [Ancient Pamphylia was situated on the southern coast of modern Turkey - The region came under the control of the Persians in the 6th century B.C. - unrv.com/provinces/pamphylia.php], we came to Myra, a city of Lycia [Galatia]. And **there the centurion found a ship of Alexandria [Egypt] sailing into Italy [Rome]; and he put us therein." -- "Acts 27:14 But not long after there arose against it a tempestuous wind, called *Euroclydon (G2148 - Euraquilo)." Luke records that the sailors called this wind Euraquilo. An unusual name, it has been found in one ancient inscription and is a slang compound [blend - marriage] of Greek and (Roman) Latin. The Greek Erus (east) and the Latin Aquilo (north) translates as "northeaster," a strong winter wind [parsagard.com/2-storm.htm]. -- "Acts 28:11-12 And after three months we departed [Malta] in **a ship of Alexandria [Egypt], which *had wintered [was dormant for a season] in the isle, whose sign [Gnosticism] was Castor and Pollux. And landing at Syracuse [a historic city in Sicily, the capital of the province of Syracuse - The city was founded by Ancient Greek Corinthians - today is part of the Unification of Italy of 1865 - Wikipedia.com], we tarried there three days." -- {Note: Remember that Mystery Babylon is that fallen Angelic realm that sits atop 7 Gentile Kingdoms that influences mankind - consisting of the time of the 2nd earth (earth 2.0) - from the flood of Noah until the 2nd Coming of Jesus Christ. - "Revelation 17:5-11 And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT [fallen angelic - Satanic realm], THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. ... And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains [Gentile Kingdoms - Nimrod (Tower of Babel), Egypt, Babylon, Persia, Greece, Rome and Revised-Rome], on which the woman sitteth. And there are seven kings [thrones i.e. throne of David - except they are all Gentile thrones]: five are fallen [Nimrod, Egypt, Babylon, Persia, Greece], and one is [Rome], and the other [Revised-Rome] is not yet come; and when he [Antichrist] cometh, he must continue a short space [3½ years and possibly until 7 years]. And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth [eight king illegally, not the eight Kingdom - the true 8th King and Kingdom is of the Messiah Jesus Christ], and is of the seven [the 7th King Antichrist tries to sit on the throne (Matthew 24:15) of Messiah the 8th Kingdo</tt><tt>m], and goeth into perdition."}</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Evidence and Paul&#8217;s Journeys &#8211; Caesarea to Fair Havens</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>The Egyptian Grain Ship (Acts 27.6) - Landing at Myra, the Centurion transfers Paul and the other prisoners to an Alexandrian grain ship bound for Rome. Myra was a major port in the eastern empire. It lay directly north of Alexandria, Egypt, on the far side of the Mediterranean. An Egyptian ship sailing for Rome would have to<br />
sail north to Myra at this time of year, because it was impossible to sail directly northwest to Rome. The prevailing wind from the west forced ships sailing from Egypt to Rome to follow this indirect route. This presents us with a series of interesting evidential coincidences. The same westerly wind that accounted for the shortness of Paul’s trip to Sidon is the wind that required his ship to sail north of Cyprus, and is also the wind that brought the Egyptian ship to Myra. All three of these events confirm the direction of the prevailing wind. Luke, in Acts 27.1, states that the ship they boarded in Caesarea was sailing for ports along the coast of the province of Asia. In other words, the ship was not bound for Rome, but was making ports of call along the southern coast of what today is Turkey. The harbor at Myra was one of the great trans-shipping ports of the ancient Mediterranean. Thus it makes sense that Paul and the others would leave the coastal vessel there and board the larger grain ship for the final leg of the voyage to Rome. [<a href="http://www.parsagard.com/1-caesarea.htm">link</a>]</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>[Part 1 of 3] Introduction: Paul&#8217;s Journey to Rome</strong> &#8211; Church History Outline: Ceasrea to Malta &#8211; End Times (Antichrist) Outline: Malta to Rome</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>The Apostle Paul's "Journey to Rome" covered in Acts chapters 27 and 28 is a unique set of passages of scripture and seems to tell a parallel story to the main story of Paul's journey and shipwreck while in route to Rome. The first part of Paul's journey from Caesarea, Israel to the shipwreck off of the shores of the island of Malta seems to tell the parallel story of what has been much of Church history up until today. The second main segment of Paul's journey beginning with Malta then the departure and the sailing to Italy, seems to tell the parallel story of the End Times, the Antichrist and the Book of Revelation. - In looking at these events one primary set of verses in each segment is going to be crucial to the study. In the first portion the Church History outline the verses Acts 27:41 and Acts 27:44 [the actual shipwreck and making it to shore] are going to be the crucial verses for the first segment. - The second segment the End Times outline the island of Malta to Rome the main verses are going to be Acts 28:13-15, Paul's arrival in Italy but at first not in Rome.</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>[Part 2 of 3] Church History Outline: Ceasrea to Malta</strong> &#8211; In Paul&#8217;s Journey to eventually stand at the feat of [the King] Caesar (Acts 26:32) the Christian Church with the Gospel departs from Israel [where Christianity originated] at the port of city of Caesarea (Acts 27:1-2) to go to the Rome and the Gentile world</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>Christian Church Age: After making some [missionary] stops along the way Paul and company (Acts 27:6) transfer to a ship [carrying nourishing wheat] that can take them to Rome. While sailing "many days" on their voyage to Rome the ship [Christian Church] encounters the alternating "contrary winds" of persecution and also the favorable port of "Fair Havens" entailing that "much time had been spent" on the Journey. - The first real hint of trouble for the Christian Church comes in the form of the Apostle Paul admonishing the Church that the Jewish Feast day [the fast] of Yom Kippur had passed and that the primarily Gentile Church was no longer marking or paying attention to the Jewish Feast Days putting the Christian Church in peril of not knowing the Times or the Seasons in which it sailed (Acts 27:9-12). The Church (ship) now unable to chart and follow its own course was caught in the winds of the days and the crew now instead of directing the ship the events of the day carried the ship (Church) along on its own course while the ship (Church) was mostly unable to affect, alter or counter any of the blowing winds (Acts 27:15). The ship (Church) tossed in the storms of life brought their sails down and just attempted to weather out the storm and at least they had four anchors to cast out into the water and help steady and protect (from hitting bottom) the Ship. The Apostle Paul then informs everyone that unless they remain aboard the one ship (of Christian faith) they cannot be saved (Acts 27:31). The one ship representing Christianity (the one true Church) then partakes in the act of Christian Communion (Acts 27:35). A distant land (Heaven) is sighted and the passengers (Christians) are not martyred but are able to reach the land (Heaven) alive as each person clings to some wood (cross of Jesus) from the one ship. The ship (Church) itself is finally caught in enough turmoil that it runs aground and breaks up [amazingly at a place were two sea's meet (Acts 27:41) - where the Eastern sea of Mysticism and the Western sea of Rationalism meet the Christian boat as one Catholic body gets stuck in the sand and breaks apart - into many denominations] though the individuals make it ashore (to Heaven) by clinging to wood (the cross of Jesus Christ), the one requirement to get a sinner into Heaven is to know that Jesus paid the penalty for our sins on His cross. With the Church (ship) stuck and broken apart and ALL the passengers (Christians) from the one ship of Christianity safely ashore (in Heaven) the Christian Church Age comes to an end (Acts 27:44). -- "Acts 27:44 And the rest [of the Christians], some on boards, and some on broken pieces of the ship [all clinging to the cross of Jesus]. **And so it came to pass, **that they escaped [sin-death] **all safe to [Heaven] land."</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Wikipedia.org: Saint Publius (Acts 28:7) &#8211; Saint Publius [a Church Apostolic Father] is venerated as the first Bishop of Malta &#8211; Publius&#8217; conversion led to Malta being the first Christian nation in the West, and one of the first in the world &#8211; He was martyred in 125 A.D., during the persecution of Emperor Hadrian</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>It was the same Publius who received the Apostle Paul during his shipwreck on the island as recounted in the Acts of the Apostles. According to the Acts of the Apostles, St. Paul cured Publius' dysentery-afflicted father. -- Book: by Rev. Alban Butler (1711-1773 A.D.). Volume I: January. "The Lives of the Saints" last published 1866. - St. Publius, Bishop and Martyr [died January 21, 125 A.D. in Athens, Greece] HE succeeded St. Dionysius the Areopagite in the see of Athens, as we are assured by St. Dionysius of Corinth, quoted by Eusebius. 1 He went to God by martyrdom, and Saint Quadratus was chosen third bishop of that city. See Le Quien, Or. Christ. t. 2. p. 169. Note 1. Euseb. l. 4. c. 23. [<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Publius">link</a>]</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>[Part 3 of 3] End Time Outline: Malta to Rome</strong> &#8211; End Times &#8211; Martyred Saints of Revelation: The refugees come ashore upon a foreign island (Malta) with &#8220;barbarous people&#8221; [barbarous only means not Romans (not citizens of the Kingdom) and not Jewish]</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>Paul and the other castaways find themselves on an unfamiliar island (Malta), a society of unfamiliar people with unfamiliar customs. In the entire narration of their time on Malta only one person is identified by name (and also by title) and it is the intriguing person of Publius (Public) [Publius a Latin (Roman) name - definition of Public: of or pertaining to the people; belonging to the people; relating to, or affecting, a nation, state, or community - ardictionary.com]. The intriguing person Publius is the "chief" or first [G4413 - Protos] person of the Island of Malta and though Publius is not a Roman citizen he has a Roman name and connections to Rome. - In this scenario, in what we are trying to read between the lines that Luke wrote for us in his book of Acts Chapters 27 and 28 we have the scenario that the Church Age has ended (Acts 27:44), the one ship of Christianity has broken apart and ALL the Christians are in Heaven. Here upon Malta (Acts 28:1) we seem to have the dispensation after Christianity [after the Church Age] - the dispensation of the End Times and the Martyred Saints of Revelation. In this intriguing scenario one person is in charge [of buying and selling] for an entire society and also that person is not a part of the 6th Kingdom in Rome. Publius is not a Roman citizen, instead this very public and in charge figure is first in his own system (the 7th Kingdom Revised Rome). Publius {before he becomes a Christian} is a type of the Antichrist and the Island society of Malta is a type of the 7th Kingdom (Revised Roman Empire). Further establishing that Luke intends for Malta to represent the Martyred Saints of End Times is that Luke tells of Paul being bitten by a viper (Acts28:3) but then Luke chooses to call the poisonous viper a "beast" (Acts 28:4,5) using the same word "beast" (G2342 - Therion) that John would later use in his Book of Revelation [Revelation 13:18 - the Mark of the Beast] to describe the Antichrist - Paul "he shook off the beast into the fire" (Acts 28:5) refusing to take the Mark of the Beast (Revelation 19:20). Luke is determined to present the spirit of Antichrist at the Island of Malta. - Note: The End Time events that Luke portrays on Malta is not quite like the End Times often portrayed today in common media, where saints are on the run for their lives. In this End Time depiction by Luke the Saints are busy, working, helpful and briefly an integrated part of the society of Malta. But the Saints have a determined destination and a departure date and depart the island society of Malta not out of anger or desperation but out of a necessity. It seems that Luke is portraying Malta [Revised Rome] as a society that is vastly different than today (there might not be any private property - everything might be 'public' in name only) a tightly controlled and managed society with each person knowing where they rank in society and one person Publius is first. Further after departing the island of Malta and continuing their Journey [a journey that is no longer given in great detail - because technically the Saints departed Malta as Martyrs]. The End Time martyrs of Malta continue on to their desired destination to the feet of the King [Caesar] but like the Book of Revelation the Martyrs of Malta do not go directly to Rome they depart the ship outside of Rome and fellowship with other believers for a while. In the Book of Revelation the 5th Seal "Revelation 6:9 And when He [Jesus] had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain (Martyrs) for [faith in] the Word of God, and for the Testimony [faith in Jesus] which they held:" The Martyred Saints of Revelation do not go directly (individually) to the Throne of Jesus but instead gather outside the Temple at the altar and fellowship until their numbers (dispensation) are complete. Then at the end of the End Times all the Martyred Saints of Revelation join (Revelation 7:9) in with the Christian Church also in Heaven worshiping at the feet of the King Jesus Christ. -- "Acts 28:14-15 Where we found brethren, and were desired to tarry with them seven days: and so we went toward Rome. And from thence, when the brethren heard of us, they came to meet us as far as Appii Forum, and The Three Taverns: whom when Paul saw, he </tt><tt>thanked God, and took courage."</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Conclusion: The Apostle Paul&#8217;s journey to Rome</strong> &#8211; Once in Rome the Apostle Paul continues to prophetically enact out End Time Biblical events &#8211; Amazingly the Apostle Paul does not go to jail with the other prisoners (unbelievers) instead Paul safely goes and lives in his own house &#8211; Enacting out the *third part (or group) of the End Times &#8211; The Millennial Reign 1,000 year Kingdom of Jesus Christ [the 8th Kingdom] on earth &#8211; (Acts Chapters 27 and 28) &#8211; <strong>Note:</strong> The Four Dispensations of the Bible’s New Testament are comprised of three groups of people. The ‘Born Again’ Church Age that included the dispensation of the original Apostles who were all ‘Born Again’ Christians and all of the current Common Christian Church Age that is also comprised of Born Again Christians. The future Martyred Saints of Revelation do not personally receive the indwelling of the Holy Spirit until after they are in Heaven [very similar to what the Old Testament Saints endured]. The third group and Fourth Dispensation is of the Millennial Saints who also do not receive the indwelling of the Holy Spirit until after the Global Nations are judged in the sheep and goats judgment of Matthew 25:32-34.The Four Dispensations of the Bible’s New Testament are comprised of three groups of people. The ‘Born Again’ Church Age that included the dispensation of the original Apostles who were all ‘Born Again’ Christians and all of the current Common Christian Church Age that is also comprised of Born Again Christians. The future Martyred Saints of Revelation do not personally receive the indwelling of the Holy Spirit until after they are in Heaven [very similar to what the Old Testament Saints endured]. The third group and Fourth Dispensation is of the Millennial Saints who also do not receive the indwelling of the Holy Spirit until after the Global Nations are judged in the sheep and goats judgment of Matthew 25:32-34.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>In the last two chapters of the Book of Acts in chapters 27 and 28 there are four distinct portions of the Apostle Paul's journey to Rome [to stand before Caesar]. The First Portion, departing Israel as an Apostle with the Christian Gospel Message until changing ships, the shipwreck and safely coming ashore at the island of Malta correlates with what has been the Apostolic age and the Common Christian Church Age. The third portion of Paul's journey is being stranded at Malta and then quickly getting to Italy but not Rome itself correlates with what is written in the Book of Revelation regarding the future End Times and the Martyred Saints of Revelation. Then the fourth and final portion of Paul's journey to Rome correlates with what is written in the Bible regarding the Millennial Reign upon the earth of the Messiah [Jesus Christ] after the events of the Book of Revelation have occurred and been fulfilled. - Once arriving in Rome (Acts 28:16) Paul [a Christian] is allowed to go live by himself in his own house while the other prisoners (unbelievers) are sent to jail (John 12:31). Living in one's own house and dwelling safely is an unmistakable euphemism for the Millennial Kingdom of the Messiah (1 Kings 4:25, Jeremiah 23:6). The Apostle Paul's recorded journey to Rome is concluded along with the Bible's Book of Acts in the last two verses of Acts. -- "Acts 28:30-31 And Paul dwelt two whole years in his own hired house [i.e. the Millennial Reign of Christ], and [free to] received all that came in unto him, Preaching the Kingdom of God, and teaching those things which concern the Lord Jesus Christ, with all conf</tt><tt>idence, no man forbidding him."</tt></p>
<div align="center">
<hr align="center" size="2" width="85%" />
</div>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: The Basic Christian blog 8 Kingdoms study is well underway and on track to be completed as scheduled &#8211; The plan now is to do one more Decoding series, a necessary one to briefly examine how kingdoms conclude, change, influence and morph  into the next ruling kingdom &#8211; Then after the brief Decoding postings are finished to go back and revisit each of the 8 Kingdoms to finalize each portion of the study &#8211; Coming Soon: Decoding Hitler&#8217;s Bunker!!</p>
<p><tt>The 8 Kingdoms study should be completed before Christmas 2011 and then the Church History portion starting in January 2012 should be able to be completed by Holy Week 2012. The Church History portion though becoming more and more in depth [during preparation] is still going to be an overview study that will primarily focus on a few key transition points in history. In order to more easily facilitate the transition points of the coming Church History blog study I have revised the outline of the study and will post that as well.</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Overview: 8 Kingdoms</strong> &#8211; The Basic Christian blog is going to try to wrap up the 8 Kingdoms (primarily ancient history) portion of the blog History Study in the next two weeks &#8211; Posting primarily on the Political Structure of each Kingdom &#8211; Then in December blogging the Christmas Holiday 2011 &#8211; After the New Year the blogging should begin on the Church History portion of the blog History Study</p>
<p><tt>Overview: 8 Kingdoms - The premise of the 8 Kingdoms Study is that each of the Kingdoms are unique in that they each have a unique (advanced) interaction with the spiritual realm. The 7 Gentile Kingdoms primarily interact with the fallen spiritual realm while the coming 8th Kingdom the Kingdom of Jesus Christ will be the visible presence of God on earth. The study is presenting Mystery Babylon [Revelation 17] as the Fallen Angelic realm out to deceive mankind, the 7 Mountains (hills) as the 7 Gentile Kingdoms (Governments) with False Religion [including pseudo (emergent) Christianity] as being represented by the scarlet woman [placed in between the fallen angelic spiritual realm and the human political realm], influenced by Mystery Babylon and able to manifest while temporarily riding above the 7 Gentile Global Governments emplaced throughout world history.</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Completed: 8 Kingdoms</strong> &#8211; For all practical purposes the Basic Christian Ministry blog has completed the 8 Kingdoms (primarily ancient history) portion of the blog History Study &#8211; A few more items will be added over time but nothing significant &#8211; The December blogging of the Christmas Holiday 2011 is scheduled next &#8211; After the New Year the blogging should begin on the Church History portion of the blog History Study &#8211; {Note: Thanks to everyone who is participating in the Basic Christian: blog Studies (blog Bible Study &#8211; blog History Study). The 8 Kingdoms Study, the first portion of the blog History Study has taken over a year and a half to complete [starting in Spring 2010] and has been a substantial project, just like the blog Bible Study was. My thanks and deep appreciation to everyone who is participating, sharing and involved with the Basic Christian blog studies especially for those who are praying for the studies and the Ministry &#8211; God bless everyone! ~ David Anson Brown}</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>Overview: 8 Kingdoms - The premise of the 8 Kingdoms Study is that each of the Kingdoms are unique in that they each have a unique (advanced) interaction with the spiritual realm. The 7 Gentile Kingdoms primarily interact with the fallen spiritual realm while the coming 8th Kingdom the Kingdom of Jesus Christ will be the visible presence of God on earth. The study is presenting Mystery Babylon [Revelation 17] as the Fallen Angelic realm out to deceive mankind, the 7 Mountains (hills) as the 7 Gentile Kingdoms (Governments) with False Religion [including pseudo (emergent) christianity] as being represented by the scarlet woman [placed in between the fallen angelic spiritual realm and the human political realm], influenced by Mystery Babylon and able to manifest while temporarily riding above the 7 Gentile Global Governments emplaced throughout world history. [<a href="http://www.basicchristian.org/blog_historystudy.html">link</a>]</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Recap: <strong>The 8th Kingdom, Jesus Christ &#8211; The Eternal Kingdom</strong> &#8211; ***<strong>The 3 Thrones of Jesus Christ</strong> &#8212; Current Throne in Heaven [alongside the Father&#8217;s Throne] (Romans 8:34, Ephesians 1:20, Colossians 3:1, Hebrews 1:3, 12:2, 1 Peter 3:22) , Eligibility: Relative &#8211; *Son of God (Father God) [eternal co-reigning with the Father and the Holy Spirit] &#8212; Future Millennial Kingdom Throne in Jerusalem [restoring the Throne of King David] (Acts 15:16, Revelation 22:16), Eligibility: Relative &#8211; *Son of Man (descendant of King David) &#8212; Eternal Throne [the Throne of the Father, Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit] (Revelation 20:4, Revelation 22:3) the Eternal Throne of the New Heaven (sky) and the New Earth, Eligibility: Jesus as [Eternal God] *Conqueror (John 16:33)</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>Currently Jesus Christ is seated on His own Throne (co-reigning - interceding) at the right hand of His Father's Throne in Heaven. "Romans 8:34 Who is he that condemneth [not Jesus]? It is [Jesus] Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, *Who is even at the right hand of God, Who also maketh intercession for us [not condemning Christians]." -- At a future date for the 1,000 year reign of Jesus Christ on earth Jesus will be seated upon the Throne of King David (Acts 2:29-33). Then with the New Heaven (sky) and the New Earth, Jesus as the conqueror of this earth [realm] will sit eternally [continuing to co-reign with the Father and the Holy Spirit on His own Throne upon the New Eternal Earth (Revelation 21:3). -- "John 16:33 These things I (Jesus) have spoken unto you, that in Me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I (Jesus) have overcome the world."</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Basic Christian &#8211; Conquering Kings:</strong> The 8 Global Kingdoms of the Earth &#8211; The 7 anointed Gentile Global Kings of the Earth (anointed from God) and the anointed 8th Kingdom the Eternal Kingdom of Jesus Christ &#8212; The Kingdoms: beginning with Nimrod (Tower of Babel &#8211; Genesis 10:8-10) &#8212; Pharaoh Akhenaten (Egypt &#8211; Joseph&#8217;s Pharaoh, the Dream Pharaoh &#8211; Genesis 41:1) &#8212; Nebuchadnezzar (Babylon &#8211; Jeremiah 27:4-7, Daniel 2:37) &#8212; Cyrus (Persia &#8211; Isaiah 45:1-7, Ezra 1:1-4) &#8212; Alexander the Great (Greece &#8211; Daniel 8:21) &#8212; Julius Caesar (Rome &#8211; Luke 2:1) &#8212; The Revised [10 Kingdom] Roman Empire (Daniel 7:19) &#8211; Antichrist (Satan &#8211; Daniel 7:20) emerges from within the Revised Roman Empire &#8212; The Messiah, Jesus Christ&#8217;s Kingdom (Heaven and Earth &#8211; Daniel 2:35, Daniel 2:44-45)</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt><strong>The 8 Conquering Kings</strong> -- Tower of Babel: Nimrod, conquered the world, gained his kingdom, probably through the arts of physical personality and persuasion (Genesis 10:9). -- Egypt: Pharaoh Akhenaten, gained his kingdom, through the means of finances [financial warfare] (Genesis 47:20). -- Babylon: Nebuchadnezzar, conquered his global kingdom primarily through military force (Jeremiah 34:1,). -- Persia: Cyrus the Great, conquered his global kingdom primarily through the use of superior technology (Ezra 1:2). -- Greece: Alexander the Great, conquered his global kingdom primarily through the use of philosophy, knowledge and superior tactics (Daniel 11:2-3, Daniel 10:20, Joel 3:6). -- Rome: Julius Caesar, conquered his global kingdom primarily through the use of laws, legalities (taxation), and treaties (Matthew 22:17, Luke 2:1, Acts 16:21). -- The Revised Roman Empire: Antichrist (Satan), is in the process of conquering his global kingdom primarily through the use of spiritual personality [witchcraft], persuasion and through a combination of all of the previously used techniques (Daniel 8:23-25). --- Millennial Reign: The Messiah, Jesus Christ has conquered the enemies of mankind for mankind. Jesus has personally conquered human sin and human death and in His Glorious victory He is making available His Kingdom of eternal Life to all of mankind (Romans 8:37, 1 Corinthians 15:26, Hebrews 2:9,14, Hebrews 9:28, Revelation 4:11).</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">GoodFight.org: The Submerging Church &#8211; How the Emerging [Revised Roman Empire] church is drawing multitudes away from Biblical Christianity &#8211; Coming to DVD January 2012 &#8211; Official DVD Trailer &#8211; {Note: The people who are participating in the Emergent church movement, either willingly or passively, are literally &#8220;holding a wolf by the ears&#8221; and when they let go or when they least expect it that wolf is going to turn and rip them to shreds. &#8212; &#8220;Ezekiel 22:27 Her [Mystery Babylon] princes in the midst [of God&#8217;s people] thereof are like wolves ravening the prey, to shed blood, and to destroy souls, to get dishonest gain. ~ Prophet Ezekiel&#8221; &#8212; &#8220;Matthew 7:15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep&#8217;s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. ~ Jesus Christ&#8221; &#8212; &#8220;Acts 20:29 For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock. ~ Apostle Paul&#8221;} (YouTube)</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>Journey with us as we take a closer look at the Emerging (also Missional - a new term that replaces Emergent) Church, its leaders, their teachings and where it is all headed when compared with bible prophecy. A Good Fight Ministries production available January 2012. [<a href="http://youtu.be/l9fcBmZRraM">link</a>]</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">What Is Discipleship? (2 Min. Video)</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>While the majority of the church is busy planning programs and activities to entertain their members and increase their numbers, they neglect the way God has ordained for His church to be built and edified. "Christian entertainment" has replaced equipping the saints for the work of the ministry, and instead of discipling disciples to make disciples, churches are overstuffing themselves with earthly waste with no eternal impact. In just two minutes, this video sums up the church’s problem and the solution to it. This is how we are to love others. This is how church should be done. This is discipleship: [<a href="http://airocross.com/2011/11/24/what-is-discipleship/">link</a>]</tt></p>
<div style="text-align: justify;" align="center">
<hr align="center" size="2" width="85%" />
</div>
<p style="text-align: justify;"> <strong>Ancient History Refresher:</strong> 1 of 4 &#8211; Noah &#8211; The 8 Global Kingdoms &#8211; Noah was a prophet and prophesied releasing the raven [unclean bird] that despite the flood mankind would still have to contend with sin, rebellion and disobedience &#8211; Noah prophesied again in releasing the dove [type of the Holy Spirit] that the Holy Spirit of God despite man&#8217;s rebellion would still dwell with mankind &#8212; &#8220;Genesis 8:7-11 And he [Noah] sent forth a raven, which went forth to and fro, until the waters were dried up from off the earth. Also he sent forth a dove from him, to see if the waters were abated from off the face of the ground; But the dove found no rest for the sole of her foot, and she returned unto him into the ark, for the waters were on the face of the whole earth: then he put forth his hand, and took her, and pulled her in unto him into the ark. And he stayed yet other seven days; and again he sent forth the dove out of the ark; And the dove came in to him in the evening; and, lo, in her mouth was an olive leaf pluckt (plucked) off: so Noah knew that the waters were abated from off the earth.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>"Genesis 8:4-18 And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the Mountains of Ararat [in the area of modern day Turkey]. And the waters decreased continually until the tenth month: in the tenth month, on the first day of the month, were the tops of the mountains seen. And it came to pass at the end of forty days, that Noah opened the window of the ark which he had made: And he sent forth a raven [a type of the sin and disobedience], which went forth to and fro [but did not return to the ark], until the waters were dried up from off the earth. Also he sent forth a dove from him, to see if the waters were abated from off the face of the ground; But the dove found no rest for the sole of her foot, and she returned unto him into the ark, for the waters were on the face of the whole earth: then he put forth his hand, and took her, and pulled her in unto him into the ark. And he stayed yet other seven days; and again he sent forth the dove [type of the Holy Spirit] out of the ark; And the dove came in to him in the evening; and, lo, in her mouth was an olive leaf [for telling Holy Week, the Mount of Olives and Gethsemane] pluckt off: so Noah knew that the waters were abated from off the earth. And he stayed yet other seven days; and sent forth the dove; which returned not again unto him any more. And it came to pass in the six hundredth and first year, in the first month, the first day of the month, the waters were dried up from off the earth: and Noah removed the covering of the ark, and looked, and, behold, the face of the ground was dry. And in the second month, on the seven and twentieth day of the month, was the earth dried. **And God spake unto Noah, saying, Go forth of the ark, thou, and thy wife, and thy sons, and thy sons' wives with thee. Bring forth with thee every living thing that is with thee, of all flesh, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; that they may breed abundantly in the earth, and be fruitful, and multiply upon the earth. And Noah went forth, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him:"</tt> <tt>[<a href="http://www.basicchristian.org/frame_blog_historystudy.html">link</a>]</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Refresher: 2 of 4 &#8211; Nimrod the 1st Gentile Kingdom</strong> [of the 7 Global Gentile Kingdoms &#8211; the 8th Kingdom being the Eternal Kingdom of Messiah Jesus Christ] &#8211; The 8 Global Kingdoms &#8211; Nimrod was the most complete type of Antichrist in disobeying God, controlling all the population and promising an eternal life to his followers &#8212; &#8220;Genesis 11:1-2 And the *whole earth was of one language [only the second generation since Noah&#8217;s Ark &#8211; *Noah -&gt; *Ham -&gt; Cush -&gt; Nimrod], and of one speech. And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east [from the Ark &#8211; Mountains of Ararat (in Turkey)], that they found a plain [open area] in the land of Shinar [closer to ancient Babylon [in Iraq] but still in the region of Turkey]; and they dwelt there.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>"Genesis 11:3-9 And they [descendants of Noah's three sons - Shem, Ham, and Japheth] said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them throughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for morter. And they said, Go to, let us build us a City and a Tower [Temple], whose top may reach unto Heaven [eternal life]; and let us make us a name [666 Mark of the Beast], lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth. And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower [false temple], which the children of men builded. And the LORD said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this [misguided evil] they begin to do: and now nothing [evil] will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do. Go to, let Us [Father God, Jesus, Holy Spirit] go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech. So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off [no longer] to build the city. Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because the LORD did there confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the LORD scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth."</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Refresher: 3 of 4</strong> &#8211; The Nation of Assyria &#8211; The 8 Global Kingdoms &#8211; Nimrod was the 1st Global Gentile Kingdom and then Ancient Egypt [2nd Global Gentile Kingdom] continued the work of Nimrod from the Tower of Babel (The rounded [tower of Babel shaped] and pointed [extended skull] crown of Ancient Egypt was modeled after Nimrod and Babel) &#8211; Ancient Egypt via the famine of Joseph&#8217;s days amassed the wealth of the world &#8211; The wealth and secrets of Egypt were later transferred to Babylon [3rd Kingdom] and not to Assyria &#8211; Assyria though a strong Nation it was not one of the 7 Gentile Occult Kingdoms &#8211; Assyria was Occult controlled and Occult influenced but unlike Nimrod, Egypt, Babylon, Greece, Rome and Revised-Rome the kingdom of Assyria was never able to interact with and forward the Occult realm [fallen angels] among mankind in the way that the other Kingdoms had accomplished.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>"1 Kings 14:25 And it came to pass in the fifth year of [Jewish] King Rehoboam, that Shishak king of Egypt came up against Jerusalem: And he took away the treasures of the House of the LORD, and the treasures of the king's house; he even took away all [and returned the gold back to Egypt]: and he took away all the shields of gold which Solomon had made." -- "2 Kings 24:7 And the king of Egypt came not again any more out of his land: for the **king of Babylon had taken from the river of Egypt unto the river Euphrates **all [wealth and knowledge] that pertained to the king of Egypt. [back in Jerusalem] Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when he began to reign, and he reigned in Jerusalem three months. And his mother's name was Nehushta, the daughter of Elnathan of Jerusalem." -- "Isaiah 45:1-7 Thus saith the LORD to His anointed, to Cyrus [of Persia (Iran) - 4th Kingdom], whose right hand I have holden, to subdue Nations before him; and I will loose the loins of Kings, to open before him the two leaved gates [of Babylon (Iraq) - 3rd Kingdom]; and the gates shall not be shut; I will go before thee, and make the crooked places straight: I will break in pieces the gates of brass, and cut in sunder the bars of iron: *And I will give thee the **Treasures of Darkness [Mystery Babylon - secret knowledge - the 7 Gentile Kingdoms 'beginning' with Nimrod and ending with Antichrist once manifested are aggregate and ongoing], **and hidden riches [wealth] of secret places, that thou mayest know that I, the LORD, which call thee by thy name, am the God of Israel. **For Jacob [the Nation of Israel] My servant's sake, and Israel mine elect, I have even called thee by thy name: I have surnamed thee, though thou hast not known Me. I am the LORD, and there is none else, there is no God beside Me: I girded thee, though thou hast not known Me: That they may know from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that there is none beside Me. I Am the LORD, and there is none else. I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things." [<a href="http://www.basicchristian.org/frame_blog_historystudy.html">link</a>]</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Refresher: 4 of 4 &#8211; <strong>Mystery Babylon</strong>, Fallen Angels, Demons, Mark of the Beast 666 &#8211; The 8 Global Kingdoms &#8211; Apparently Spiritual Realm [fallen Angelic] doors that were open in the days before the flood of Noah and that were closed by the global judgment flood of Noah were quickly reopened only two generations later by Nimrod. &#8212; &#8220;2 Peter 3:5-7 For this [ancient times &#8211; Days of Noah] they [unbelievers] willingly are ignorant of, that by the Word of God [Genesis Creation] the heavens [sky] were of old, and the earth [1st earth pre-flood] standing out of the water and in the water: Whereby **the world [earth 1.0] that then was, being overflowed with water, **perished: But the heavens and the earth [2.0], which are now, by the same Word are kept in store, reserved unto *fire against the **Day of Judgment [global Judgment &#8211; <strong>the three global judgments;</strong> <strong>water [Noah], blood [Cross], fire (Spirit)</strong>] and perdition of ungodly men.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><tt>In the days before Noah (Genesis 6:2) the Fallen Angels were 'physically' mating with mankind [the daughters of man] and physically corrupting mankind. Angels both Holy and fallen can manifest as humans (Genesis 18:1-2) and the fallen angels apparently engineered [i.e. gene DNA modification, i.e. chimaera] a way to create offspring through their physical sexual interaction with humans. - Since the days after the flood of Noah and now the earth with a Demonic presence [the departed spirits of the Nephilm offspring of fallen angels and humans] along with the fallen angelic presence. The emphasis in corrupting mankind has turned from physical interaction [pre-flood - fallen angels and humans mating - though still happening in rare occasions] to now with demons present a spiritual possession and spiritual corruption [Mark of the Beast 666] mating between demons and humans. -- "Daniel 2:43 And whereas thou sawest iron [demons] mixed with miry clay [sinful humans], they [demons] shall mingle [666 Mark of the Beast] themselves with the seed [soul-spirit] of men: but they shall not cleave [fit together] one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay." -- "Revelation 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the Beast [Antichrist (7th Kingdom)]: for it is the number of a **man [i.e. completing what Nimrod (1st Kingdom) attempted to do but was only able to start [initiate] because the languages were confused (Genesis 11:7)]; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six [666]."</tt></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Original Source:  <tt><a href="http://www.basicchristian.org/frame_blog_historystudy.html" target="_blank">www.BasicChristian.org - blog History Study</a></tt><tt> 2010-2011<br />
by David Anson Brown</tt></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>January 2013 Update</title>
		<link>http://the-jesus-realm.com/wordpress/2013/01/12/january-2013-update/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Anson Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 12:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[David Anson Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-jesus-realm.com/wordpress/?p=51</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While the blog is researching and looking into current information to post regarding the current emergent New World Order and its accompanying New World Court System now would be a good time to have a few review posts. Regarding Hollywood, Movies and the Media in general and their large participation in shaping, molding and steering&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the blog is researching and looking into current information to post regarding the current emergent New World Order and its accompanying New World Court System now would be a good time to have a few review posts.</p>
<p>Regarding Hollywood, Movies and the Media in general and their large participation in shaping, molding and steering of public opinion into a secular One World system we are going to re-review two series of movie reviews first posted in 2011 at the <a href="http://www.basicchristian.org/frame_blog_historystudy.html" target="_blank">BasicChristian.org</a> website. The two movies reviewed are “Cool Hand Luke” (1967) and the “The Bad and The Ugly” (1966) with a few other 1960’s ‘Losing your Religion’ type movies mentioned.</p>
<p>God bless everyone!</p>
<p>David Anson Brown</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie Review-Repost of &#8220;Cool Hand Luke&#8221; (1967)</title>
		<link>http://the-jesus-realm.com/wordpress/2013/01/12/movie-review-repost-of-cool-hand-luke/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Anson Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 12:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[David Anson Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decoded Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-jesus-realm.com/wordpress/?p=49</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Originally Posted in 2011 about July &#8211; August at BasicChristian.org by David Anson Brown Update 2011: The Basic Christian Ministry still has more material to post and I would like to detour from the 8 Kingdoms/History Study and re-examine Doctrines and Theology particularly; Redemption, Salvation, Baptism, Born-Again, Once Saved Always Saved, Etc. &#8211; But before&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Originally Posted in 2011 about July &#8211; August at <a href="http://www.basicchristian.org/frame_blog_historystudy.html" target="_blank">BasicChristian.org</a><br />
by David Anson Brown</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Update 2011:</strong> The Basic Christian Ministry still has more material to post and I would like to detour from the 8 Kingdoms/History Study and re-examine Doctrines and Theology particularly; Redemption, Salvation, Baptism, Born-Again, Once Saved Always Saved, Etc. &#8211; But before we get back into more Doctrine it&#8217;s possible that I might do another short series this time decoding the 1967 movie &#8216;Cool Hand Luke&#8217; &#8211; Also it looks like I will have a few breaks in posting between now (July) and September so around September 2011 we should be back full-speed into the 8 Kingdoms &amp; Church History Study ~</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">God bless everyone,<br />
David Anson Brown</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The 1967 movie Cool Hand Luke is kind of the movie where all the previous Occult introduction themes [rebellion, disobedience, drugs, nudity, sexuality, homosexuality, etc.] finally gained mainstream acceptance with the general public and movie audience. After Cool Hand Luke [highly based off the 1965 movie King Rat] and many other similar Occult themed [losing your religion] movies the rebellion of the 1960&#8217;s entered virtually unabated into almost all segments of society [some of the theme music from Cool Hand Luke became the theme sound for most of the Nation&#8217;s nightly &#8216;Eyewitness News&#8217; broadcasts]. &#8212; Though obvious the primary reason for decoding the movie &#8216;Cool Hand Luke&#8217; is not going to be to point out all the rebellion and societal angst that is purposely scripted and directed into the movie [as we did with the 1966 movie The Good, The Bad and The Ugly]. Instead the movie &#8216;Cool Hand Luke&#8217; [in attempting to ruin religion] accidently portrays a very realistic portrayal of a sinful man &#8216;Luke&#8217; seeking and groping after a real relationship with the Holy God. The question the movie fails to ask but we will not fail to ask is &#8216;in the end was Luke saved?&#8217; <strong>The question of Luke&#8217;s salvation is going to be paramount to our brief study</strong> and it is going to be the premise and conclusion of this study that yes indeed the slightly fictional character of Cool Hand Luke if real would indeed be saved and in heaven. &#8212; Coming Soon: &#8216;Cool Hand Luke&#8217; decoded. <a title="basicchristian.org" href="http://basicchristian.org/frame_blog_historystudy.html" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<div align="center">
<hr align="center" size="2" width="45%" />
</div>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Cool Hand Luke (1967) Part 1 (YouTube)<br />
Paul Newman was nominated for an Oscar and George Kennedy received one for his work in this allegorical prison drama. Luke Jackson (Paul Newman) is sentenced to a 2 year stretch on a Florida chain gang (Road Prison) after he&#8217;s arrested for drunkenly decapitating parking meters. While the avowed ambition of the captain (Strother Martin) is for each prisoner to &#8220;get their mind right,&#8221; it soon becomes obvious that Luke is not about to give in/submit to anybody. When challenged to a fistfight by fellow inmate Dragline (George Kennedy), Luke simply refuses to give up, even though he&#8217;s brutally beaten. Luke knows how to win at poker, even with bad cards, by using his smarts and playing it cool. Luke also figures out a way for the men to get their work done in half the usual time, giving them one afternoon off. Finally, when Luke finds out his mother has died, he plots his escape; when he&#8217;s caught, he simply escapes again. Soon, Luke becomes a symbol of hope and resilience to the other men in the prison camp &#8212; and a symbol of rebelliousness that must be stamped out by the guards and the captain. Along with stellar performances by Newman, Kennedy, and Martin, Cool Hand Luke features a superb supporting cast, including Ralph Waite, Harry Dean Stanton, Dennis Hopper, Wayne Rogers, and Joe Don Baker as members of the chain gang [and Jo Van Fleet as Luke&#8217;s dysfunctional mother Arletta]. <a title="youtube.com" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV1yHrqXA88" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Cool Hand Luke &#8211; Wikipedia: Eyewitness News &#8211; Eyewitness News is a name used by local television newscasts, widely used in different markets across the United States &#8211; The earliest known use of the Eyewitness News name in American television was in April 1959 when KYW-TV (now WKYC-TV) in Cleveland, owned at the time by Westinghouse Broadcasting, launched the nation&#8217;s first 90-minute local newscast (under the title Eyewitness), combined with the then 15-minute national newscast &#8211; Primo used the cue 007 from the 1963 film From Russia with Love as the musical theme &#8211; In 1968, Primo moved to WABC-TV in New York City and took the Eyewitness News concept there with him, choosing music from the 1967 Paul Newman film Cool Hand Luke &#8211; the &#8220;Tar Sequence&#8221; cue (composed by Lalo Schifrin) as the theme &#8211; However, he added a new twist at WABC-TV-chatter among the anchors, which came to be known as &#8220;happy talk&#8221;<br />
Origins: The earliest known use of the Eyewitness News name in American television was in April 1959 when KYW-TV (now WKYC-TV) in Cleveland, owned at the time by Westinghouse Broadcasting, launched the nation&#8217;s first 90-minute local newscast (under the title Eyewitness), combined with the then 15-minute national newscast. The name was then adopted for use by Westinghouse&#8217;s other television stations-KPIX in San Francisco, WJZ-TV in Baltimore, WBZ-TV in Boston and KDKA-TV in Pittsburgh-for its local newscasts. &#8230; between stories to let viewers know their personalities. Primo used the cue 007 from the 1963 film From Russia with Love as the musical theme. The format quickly became a hit in Philadelphia and allowed KYW-TV to surge past longtime leader WCAU-TV for first place, a position it kept on and off until the late 1970s. KYW-TV&#8217;s success spawned rival station WFIL-TV (now WPVI-TV) to develop the Action News format to compete with it. (After NBC was ordered back to Cleveland in 1965, the Eyewitness News name left that city until WEWS adopted it for its newscasts in the 1970s). &#8212; Expansion: In 1968, Primo moved to WABC-TV in New York City and took the Eyewitness News concept there with him, choosing music from the 1967 Paul Newman film Cool Hand Luke &#8211; the &#8220;Tar Sequence&#8221; cue (composed by Lalo Schifrin) &#8211; as the theme. However, he added a new twist at WABC-TV-chatter among the anchors, which came to be known as &#8220;happy talk&#8221;. Among the newscasters in the first wave of happy talk on WABC was a very young Geraldo Rivera, a comical and entertaining weatherman in Tex Antoine, and with Roger Grimsby as traditional humorless anchorman. WABC-TV has kept the name and format since then, and has been the highest-rated station in New York for much of that time. &#8212; The format, as tweaked by WABC-TV, was copied by many other stations in the United States, with four other stations owned and operated by ABC &#8211; KABC-TV in Los Angeles, WLS-TV in Chicago, WXYZ-TV in Detroit and KGO-TV in San Francisco &#8212; using both the format and the Cool Hand Luke theme. (In the case of KGO, since KPIX was already using the Eyewitness News name, KGO named its newscast Channel 7 NewsScene in 1969 and by 1983 simply Channel 7 News, while WXYZ used the Action News name since rival WJBK-TV called its newscasts Eyewitness News; KABC and WLS were free to use the Eyewitness News name as did WABC-TV). Ironically, WPVI, which developed the Action News format, is also now an ABC owned-and-operated station. In addition, U.S. Spanish-language stations also use their own version of Eyewitness News, called Noticias de Primera Plana (Headline News, a concept translation in Spanish of Eyewitness News) on its owned-and-operated stations. <a title="wikipedia.org" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyewitness_News" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<div align="center">
<hr align="center" size="2" width="45%" />
</div>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Introduction</strong><br />
The false premise of the movie &#8216;Cool Hand Luke&#8217; is that Society is accurately structured off of Religion and that society therefore accurately reflects religion i.e. Christianity and that to then properly conform to Society is to properly conform to Religion and therefore be &#8216;Saved&#8217; by God &#8211; This very false [straw man] proposition [with society being wrong then God must be wrong] regarding Society in equating Society to Religion is much of what we are going to examine in this series of decoding the movie &#8216;Cool Hand Luke&#8217; &#8212; {Note: Biblically [Revelation chapters 1-4] it is clear that the Christian Church in whole often does not accurately reflect the image of God (Jesus), and much less does society as a whole, but that individuals [i.e. Cool Hand Luke] do at times more accurately reflect the true image of Jesus Christ as God has intended for all mankind.}<br />
The reason the movie as a whole is a &#8220;straw-man proposal&#8221; [society being wrong so God must be wrong] movie presentation and an obvious one at that is that the straw &#8216;not real&#8217; and easily swept away argument being that society accurately represents Christianity and therefore a dysfunctional Society [on whole or in part] is an offspring of a dysfunctional religion i.e. Christianity and being dysfunctional then reasonable people would have every reasonable need to depart from a dysfunctional [religion] system and incorporate a much less &#8216;dysfunctional&#8217; [seemingly freely open] i.e. prison (socialism) society system and style for their own life and culture. Of course reality is that human society has little to do with actual Biblical Christianity [even within the Church, Mega-Church system] especially regarding sinful mankind. The movie is falsely portraying a Society equals Religion premise and insinuating that Luke while rebelling against society&#8217;s unfairness is actually rebelling against the unfairness of God. But in reality Luke in rebelling against the unfair nature of society [Church (Mega-Church) and State] is actually in more of a true relationship with the just, righteous and fair God of the Bible than many people [Christians included] would rightly realize.</p>
<div align="center">
<hr align="center" size="2" width="45%" />
</div>
<p style="text-align: justify;">[Movie] King Rat (1965) Both Steve McQueen and Paul Newman [Cool Hand Luke] turned down the lead in this intriguing film<br />
This film (King Rat) also has a secondary storyline about the role of class in our society. Most of the British POWs are officers of fine breeding while King is an enlisted man of a questionable background. Some of the &#8220;upper-crust&#8221; British feel it is beneath them to work with someone like Cpl. King, let alone be bested or dependent upon him. This class-warfare intrigue is still in question today. Are some people better than others because of who they are? Rich vs. poor, male vs. female, white vs. black, educated vs. street smarts are all still issues plaguing humanity. &#8212; This film is based upon a best-selling novel by James Clavell. Clavell spent much of his literary life writing a series of best-selling novels about Asia and its interaction with the West. From &#8216;Shogun&#8217; to &#8216;Noble House&#8217; to &#8216;Gai-Jin&#8217; all of Clavell&#8217;s novels about Asia are intriguing. The mini-series based upon &#8216;Shogun&#8217;, starring Richard Chamberlin and Toshiro Mifune, is still one of my favorite television events. And this novel is one of his best. Whether you like intense drama or prefer intellectual action, King Rat will provide some enjoyable entertainment. Upon viewing please keep one question in the back of your mind. If you were in a similar situation, would make a deal for food or would you starve for principle and honor? Filmed in 1965, directed by Bryan Forbes, written by Forbes from the novel by James Clavell, starring George Segal, John Mills, Tom Courtenay, James Fox and Denholm Elliott. &#8212; Wiki.com James Clavell &#8211; Early life and World War II: Born in Australia, Clavell was the son of Commander Richard Clavell, a British Royal Navy officer who was stationed in Australia on secondment from the Royal Navy to the Royal Australian Navy. In 1940, when Clavell finished his secondary schooling at Portsmouth Grammar School, he joined the Royal Artillery to follow his family tradition. Following the outbreak of World War II, at the age of 16 he joined the Royal Artillery in 1940, and was sent to Malaya to fight the Japanese. Wounded by machine-gun fire, he was eventually captured and sent to a Japanese prisoner-of-war camp on Java. Later he was transferred to Changi Prison in Singapore. Clavell suffered greatly at the hands of his Japanese captors. According to the introduction to King Rat, written by Clavell, over 90% of the prisoners who entered Changi never walked out, although the actual mortality rate was under 1% [850 out of a total of 87,000 prisoners are known to have died at Changi, although many more died after being transferred out to other sites like the Death Railway]. Clavell was reportedly saved, along with an entire battalion, by an American prisoner of war who later became the model for &#8220;The King&#8221; in Clavell&#8217;s King Rat. <a title="cinemastevekrueger.blogspot.com" href="http://cinemastevekrueger.blogspot.com/2011/05/king-rat.html" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Cool Hand Luke (background)</strong> &#8211; Wikipedia: Donn Pearce an American author best known for the novel and screen play &#8216;Cool Hand Luke&#8217; &#8211; He served two years in the Florida Department of Corrections chain gangs [Road Camp No. 48] &#8211; In 1965 Scribners published his first novel, Cool Hand Luke, and he went on to write the Academy Award-nominated screenplay for the 1967 film version &#8211; The film starred Paul Newman, and Pearce made a cameo appearance as a convict named Sailor<br />
Donn Pearce (born 1928) is an American author best known for the novel and screen play Cool Hand Luke. &#8212; Born Donald Mills Pearce in a suburb of Philadelphia, Pearce left home at 15. He attempted to join the United States Merchant Marine at 16, but was turned away due to his age. He lied about his age, registered for the draft, and was inducted into the United States Army in 1944. Frustrated by rules he considered unnecessary, he went AWOL, then three days later thought better of it and turned himself in to a Navy MP. His sentence was 30 days in the stockade. He served three days of his sentence, then was transferred to a combat infantry unit. Anticipating being sent to the front (this was during WWII), he wrote his mother a letter. She contacted the Army, informed them of his true age, and he was thrown out of the Army. By this time, he was old enough to join the Merchant Marine. &#8212; The Merchant Marine took him to Venice when he was 18, to Spain, Denmark, France, Portugal and Bombay. Post-war Europe had a thriving black market, and Pearce became involved in counterfeiting American money. He attempted to pass some counterfeit bills to a police officer in Marseilles, and was arrested, tried, and sent to prison. Assigned to a work detail outside the prison grounds, Pearce escaped, making his way to the Italian border. The French officials had taken his seaman&#8217;s papers, so he forged new ones and signed on a ship to Canada. He crossed from Canada into the United States, where he began a new career &#8211; burglary. &#8212; He became a safecracker, and in 1949, at the age of twenty, he was arrested for burglary. He served two years in the Florida Department of Corrections chain gangs. In 1965 Scribners published his first novel, Cool Hand Luke, and he went on to write the Academy Award-nominated screenplay for the 1967 film version. The film starred Paul Newman, and Pearce made a cameo appearance as a convict named Sailor. His other books included Pier Head Jump (1972) and Dying in the Sun (1974). During the seventies and early eighties he was a freelance journalist, often contributing to magazines such as Playboy and Esquire. In 2005 he published a fourth book, Nobody Comes Back, a novel about the Battle of the Bulge, which received an excellent review from Malcom Jones in the 21 February 2005 edition of Newsweek. Pearce continues to live and write in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. <a title="wikipedia.org" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donn_Pearce" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Cool Hand Luke (Updated &#8211; Background)</strong> &#8211; imdb: Biography for Donn Pearce &#8211; &#8220;I seem to be the only guy in the United States who doesn&#8217;t like the movie&#8221; Pearce told the Miami Herald in 1989 &#8211; &#8220;Everyone had a whack at it &#8211; They screwed (manipulated) it up 99 different ways&#8221;<br />
It&#8217;s been said that if Donn Pearce is remembered at all, it won&#8217;t be for having written &#8220;Cool Hand Luke,&#8221; his acclaimed but little-read novel about his life as a convict on a southern chain gang, but for the classic movie based on it. Starring Paul Newman in the Oscar-nominated title role, Cool Hand Luke (1967) was both a critical and commercial success. An outstanding film across the board, it brought us one of the screen&#8217;s most compelling anti-heroes and one of the all-time great movie lines: &#8220;What we&#8217;ve got here is failure to communicate.&#8221; Nominated for Best Picture, &#8220;Cool Hand Luke&#8221; was one of the key films of the Sixties. Many consider it a masterpiece. &#8211; Donn Pearce is not one of them. &#8211; &#8220;I seem to be the only guy in the United States who doesn&#8217;t like the movie,&#8221; Pearce told the Miami Herald in 1989. &#8220;Everyone had a whack at it. They screwed it up 99 different ways.&#8221; <a title="imdb.com" href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0668914/bio" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">[Movie] &#8216;Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid&#8217; is a 1969 American Western [losing your religion] film directed by George Roy Hill and written by William Goldman &#8211; The title roles were originally cast with Paul Newman and Steve McQueen, but the latter (McQueen) left after a dispute over billing &#8211; The role of Sundance was then offered to Jack Lemmon, whose production company, JML, had produced the 1967 film Cool Hand Luke starring Newman &#8212; Note: According to the DVD director commentary director George Roy Hill during pre-production for his 1969 movie Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid went to Europe (Italy) in 1966 knowing that the movie by Sergio Leone &#8220;The Good, the Bad and the Ugly&#8221; would not be released to American audiences until 1968. In viewing the movie &#8220;The Good, the Bad and the Ugly&#8221; he later incorporated some of the film style [slow-motion and noise emphasis] from Sergio Leone into the shootout sequence in scene #21 titled &#8216;Going straight&#8217; the scene also included fellow Cool Hand Luke actor Strother Martin.<br />
Production: The film was originally rated M (for mature audiences) by the Motion Picture Association of America. It was re-rated PG when 20th Century Fox re-released the film in 1974. According to the supplemental material on the Blu-ray disc release, William Goldman&#8217;s script, originally called The Sundance Kid and Butch Cassidy, was purchased by Richard Zanuck at 20th Century Fox for $400,000, double the price the studio&#8217;s board of directors had authorized. The title roles were originally cast with Newman and Steve McQueen, but the latter left after a dispute over billing. The role of Sundance was then offered to Jack Lemmon, whose production company, JML, had produced the 1967 film Cool Hand Luke starring Newman, who had been grateful for Lemmon&#8217;s&#8230;Lemmon, however, turned down the role; he did not like riding horses, and he also felt he had already played too many aspects of the Sundance Kid&#8217;s character before. Warren Beatty was then considered, as was Marlon Brando, but the role of Sundance eventually went to the lesser-known Redford. (Initially Newman was to play Sundance (whom he did not resemble) and Redford Cassidy.) Fox [studio] did not want Redford, but director George Roy Hill insisted. Redford later said this film catapulted him to stardom and irreversibly changed his career. Butch Cassidy&#8217;s outlaw gang was actually called &#8220;The Wild Bunch&#8221;; this was changed, in the film, to &#8220;The Hole-In-The-Wall Gang&#8221; to avoid confusion with Sam Peckinpah&#8217;s recently released film The Wild Bunch. &#8212; Box office: With a box office of over US$100 million (equivalent to over $500 million in 2009 dollars), it was the top grossing film of the year. <a title="wikipedia.org" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butch_Cassidy_and_the_Sundance_Kid" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<div align="center">
<hr align="center" size="2" width="45%" />
</div>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Cool Hand Luke</strong> &#8211; The movie Cool Hand Luke&#8217;s opening scene is of a normal looking guy [Luke] who happens to be in the process of damaging Govt. property by cutting off the tops of the parking meters in his small town&#8217;s shopping district<br />
The word &#8216;violation&#8217; looms from each parking meter as Luke topples it from its stand. Luke following his own BYOB policy, a bottle opener hanging from a chain around his neck, has brought his own beer to his own little getting even party. The intoxicated Luke has a grand time while he spends a few minutes in the dark of night &#8220;evening the score&#8221; for a parking ticket that Luke certainly didn&#8217;t deserve. Soon, as expected a local police officer pulls his patrol car to the curb and asks Luke &#8220;what are you doing there fella?&#8221; The movie viewer is instantly presented with a series of internal conflicts regarding the situation. Knowing that what Luke is doing is wrong but hoping that the officer will see the good natured humor in Luke&#8217;s antics and simply drive Luke home for a needed night&#8217;s rest and a chance for Luke to sober up from his mostly harmless antics of the night. &#8212; The second scene of the movie quickly reveals that not only was Luke not given a break in being taken home and let off by the police but Luke was not given any kind of a break in the form of either a fine or a suspended sentence, instead Luke is on his way to prison. Note: The opening scene is complete and almost overstuffed with occult themes [rebellion, alcohol, intoxication, disobedience] and imagery, a neon sign blazing the single word &#8220;Drugs&#8221; is the main backdrop for much of the scene and stylistically comes into view just as the officer is asking Luke &#8220;what are you doing there fella?&#8221; i.e. drugs. The main prop in the opening scene is the looming red light of a distant streetlight warning everyone [Luke and the audiance] to stop any and all dissent that is in any way directed towards government at any level. <a title="basicchristian.org" href="http://basicchristian.org/frame_blog_historystudy.html" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Cool Hand Luke</strong> &#8211; In the movie&#8217;s 2nd scene titled &#8220;Yes, Cap&#8217;n&#8221; Luke and three new fellow inmates arrive at the prison &#8220;Road Prison Camp No. 36&#8221; under the leering eyes of an inmate trustee and to the sounds of baying dogs the four new prisoners encounter a prison guard and meet the Camp Commandant [Captain &#8211; played by Strother Martin] in being inducted into their new prison surroundings<br />
This second scene is one of the important pivotal scenes of the movie. The first new prisoner [Alibi &#8211; played by &#8216;The Waltons&#8217; family TV show star Ralph Waite] reveals his sentence of two years for the horrendous crime of manslaughter, the accidental death of another person. Soon we are startled to learn that Luke also has received in his case a very steep two year penalty as well and not for the crime of manslaughter but for the victimless crime of damaging government property. &#8212; Further the scene goes on to reveal the dreadful news that not only has Luke committed the grievous act of interfering with government property particularly property [parking meters] that help finance and enrich the government but Luke is also on record for having committed the other grievous act against the government, the act of disobedience in disobeying Army authority [he was reduced in rank from Sargent back down to Private]. The viewer begins to get a brief sense of a foreboding future for Luke in that Luke having committed not one but two sins, the two most unforgiving sins, against the government [state and church] system in committing acts of disobedience to authority and by interfering even ever so slightly by momentarily hindering the governments&#8217; ability to continually collect tax from the citizens [via a parking tax]. The audience begins to sense that Luke&#8217;s mostly innocent behavior is going to have a disastrous result for Luke in that the government [state &#8211; church &#8211; mega-church] system will not tolerate in any way financial meddling or disobedience to authority of any kind. Note: in the scene a white picket fence is clearly prominent when the new prisoners arrive outside the Warden&#8217;s house. The prisoner trustee &#8216;Dog Boy&#8217; is also seen petting the bloodhound &#8216;Blue&#8217; next to the fence. The white picket fence [attempts to reveal in the movie&#8217;s false premise] that society makes and enforces a just and orderly rule of law [as opposed to the true Word of God revealing just law for all]. After the prisoners introduction they are led away from the white picket fence to their new housing area an area where a large locked metal gate and chain linked fence topped with barbed wire surrounds where the prisoners of society live.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Cool Hand Luke</strong> &#8211; In one of the truly amazing scenes of the movie, or of any movie, is the interaction between Luke and his visiting Mother Arletta (played by Jo Van Fleet) &#8211; Luke calling his mother only by her name &#8220;Arletta&#8221; and Arletta constantly referring to Luke only as &#8220;kid&#8221; unleashes a barrage of un-motherly love on Luke the likes of which the world has seldom witnessed<br />
The [carefully written and scripted] scene begins with an ill Arletta having been toted to the prison camp compound in a makeshift bed in the back of an old pickup truck driven by her son John [a half-brother to Luke], John is accompanied by a young son of his own. Arletta wastes no time in harassing Luke by beckoning him to come around to the other side of the pickup truck bed knowing full well that Luke can&#8217;t go out of sight of the prison guard. The guard quickly denies Luke permission to go where Arletta as beckoned him to be. A smiling Arletta briefly relishes in her ability to make life impossible for her favored son Luke. Immediately Arletta begins to challenge Luke in his lack of having any children of his own. Luke comments that yeah it cannot be done just now. Moving on to more devastation Arletta begins to side with everyone but Luke in her taking sides with the law, any past girlfriend or anything else that can put Luke down. In the crescendo of the scene Arletta begins to cough and choke while an obedient Luke lifts a glass of water to her, yet amazingly Arletta won&#8217;t even give Luke the satisfaction of assisting her and Arletta twice refuses to accept the much needed glass of water from Luke&#8217;s outstretched hand. Previously Arletta had just dug into Luke by pointing out that Luke had never met his biological father &#8211; something Luke would have liked to have done. Permanently finishing Luke off Arletta tells him that she will soon be dead and &#8220;it won&#8217;t matter what he does when he gets out of prison&#8221; and that she was going to leave everything to his half-brother John so regardless his life didn&#8217;t matter to her anyhow but that he should try to just &#8220;laugh if up&#8221; anyhow. &#8212; After Luke has been unfairly kicked while he is down by the system and now by his own family the movie at its lowest point then introduces religion as a main new theme in the movie.</p>
<div align="center">
<hr align="center" size="2" width="45%" />
</div>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Cool Hand Luke &#8211; filmsite: Luke&#8217;s sickly, dying mother Arletta (Jo Van Fleet) visits one Sunday afternoon to say goodbye &#8211; Review by Tim Dirks<br />
Luke&#8217;s sickly, dying mother Arletta (Jo Van Fleet) visits one Sunday afternoon to say goodbye, stiffly and painfully propped up in the bed of the pickup truck &#8211; it is presumably their last time together. Driven by her respectable son John, Sr. (John Pearce), she is chain-smoking a cigarette while coughing [with lung cancer or consumptive TB?]. Arletta still cares and expresses warm affection for her wayward yet favored son &#8211; but with guarded words. Although she is disappointed about how he turned out (and feeling guilty about her role as caregiver), Luke tells her that she&#8217;d done her best raising him as a single mother. In the tragic scene which implies much about her son&#8217;s broken childhood and upbringing, the terminally-ill Arletta expresses regrets and resigns herself to &#8220;let go&#8221; of her independent-minded son who tried to live like she did &#8211; &#8220;free and above board.&#8221; In the poignant conclusion to their conversation, she plans &#8211; after her death &#8211; to give her inheritance to her less-loved son John. <a title="filmsite.org" href="http://www.filmsite.org/cool2.html" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Cool Hand Luke &#8211; Where Are They Now? Joy Harmon (The Girl) &#8211; Aunt Joy&#8217;s Cakes &#8211; Aunt Joy&#8217;s Cakes began with Joy Harmon&#8217;s love for sweets and lifelong passion for baking &#8211; most remembered for her role in the movie &#8220;Cool Hand Luke&#8221; starring Paul Newman and George Kennedy &#8211; Joy Harmon plays a sexy, young woman who the men in the chain gang call Lucille &#8211; She drives the prisoners crazy as she seductively washes her car on a hot summer day<br />
Aunt Joy&#8217;s Cakes began with Joy Harmon&#8217;s love for sweets and lifelong passion for baking. Before she was Aunt Joy, Joy Harmon was an actress in the sixties known for her ingénue style. She enjoyed bringing freshly baked goods for all of her co-workers, including Groucho Marx, who Joy Harmon appeared with on the television shows &#8220;You Bet Your Life&#8221; and &#8220;Tell It to Groucho.&#8221; She also acted in many films, such as &#8220;Village of the Giants&#8221; and &#8220;Angel in my Pocket,&#8221; but is most remembered for her role in the movie &#8220;Cool Hand Luke&#8221; starring Paul Newman and George Kennedy, who won the Oscar as Best Supporting Actor for the film. Joy Harmon plays a sexy, young woman who the men in the chain gang call Lucille. She drives the prisoners crazy as she seductively washes her car on a hot summer day. Although Joy Harmon&#8217;s legendary car wash scene lasted less than five minutes, it made history as one of the sexiest scenes in a motion picture. &#8212; Aunt Joy&#8217;s Cakes started in the kitchen of her home in California. The name originated when Joy Harmon began supplying cakes to her niece&#8217;s coffee shop. Whenever she made a delivery her niece would cheer, &#8220;Aunt Joy&#8217;s cakes are here!&#8221; Then Joy Harmon started supplying her desserts to Disney Studios, where her son worked and spread the word about his mom&#8217;s mouthwatering cakes and cookies. Her homemade desserts were becoming very popular, and Joy Harmon started supplying her baked goods to many more studios in the Los Angeles area. The demand for her delicious treats became too great for her to do alone in her kitchen, so now Joy Harmon is sharing her recipes and baking her secrets with her children. They are now running a wholesale bakery in Burbank, California specializing in cakes, cupcakes, cookies, and chocolate dipped strawberries. <a title="auntjoyscakes.com" href="http://www.auntjoyscakes.com/about_us.html" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">King Rat &#8211; Where Are They Now? James Fox as Peter Marlowe [a type of a Christian missionary who loses his religion and joins in with the Devil &#8220;King Rat&#8221;] from Hut 16 in the movie &#8220;King Rat&#8221; &#8211; Fox subsequently joined [1970 to 1979] a religious organization known as &#8220;The Navigators&#8221; which is similar to the Gideons and is closely associated with the ministry of Billy Graham<br />
Mini Biography: James Fox is the second of three sons, born to the theatrical agent Robin Fox and his actress wife Angela Worthington &#8211; aka Angela Fox. His brothers are the actor Edward Fox and the producer Robert Fox. He started acting as a child actor and used his real name, until he reached his early 20s. He trained at the Central School of Speech and Drama. He left for nine years from 1970 to 1979 to pursue Christian vocational work. His niece is the actress Emilia Fox and he has a half-brother to the actor Daniel Chatto. From his marriage to Mary Piper, he has four sons: Thomas Fox, born 1975; Robin Fox, born 1976; the actors Laurence Fox, born 1978; Jack Fox, born 1985, and one daughter, Lydia Fox, born 1979. He published a book, &#8220;Comeback: An Actor&#8217;s Direction&#8221;, in 1983. &#8230; Fox left the acting profession for nine years (1970-79) after he filmed Performance (1970) with Mick Jagger. A combination of his father&#8217;s recent death, the strain of filming and smoking the hallucinogen DMT with Mick Jagger led to a nervous breakdown. Fox subsequently joined a religious organization known as &#8220;The Navigators&#8221; which is similar to the Gideons and is closely associated with the ministry of Billy Graham. &#8230; Personal Quotes: [On his 9-year break from acting]: People think Performance (1970) blew my mind&#8230; my mind was blown long before that. Performance (1970) gave me doubts about my way of life. Before that I had been completely involved in the more bawdy side of the film business. But after that everything changed. <a title="imdb.com" href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0289038/bio" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Cool Hand Luke &#8211; Where Are They Now? &#8211; Paul Newman (1925-2008) &#8211; In a 1980 interview with TIME magazine, Newman said he identified himself as Jewish, stating, &#8220;it&#8217;s more of a challenge&#8221; In Israel and among Jews worldwide, he will always be remembered as Ari Ben Canaan, the Zionist rebel of [the 1960 movie] Exodus who seizes a cargo ship and smuggles 600 Holocaust survivors to Palestine despite British opposition (2008 Haaretz.com) &#8211; founded Newman&#8217;s Own, a successful food company he built from the ground up in which all the proceeds go to charity &#8211; He would also start The Hole in the Wall Gang Camps, an organization for terminally ill children<br />
Mini Biography: Paul Leonard Newman was born in January of 1925, the second son of Arthur and Theresa (nee&#8217; Fetsko) Newman in Cleveland, Ohio. The Newmans were a well-to-do family and Paul grew up in a nice home in Shaker Heights. Newman&#8217;s father, the son of Jewish immigrants from Poland and Hungary, was the owner of a highly successful sporting goods store. Paul&#8217;s mother, a practicing Christian Scientist of Slovakian decent, and his uncle Joe had an interest in creative arts and it rubbed off on him. &#8230; He is as well known today for his philanthropic ways and highly successful business ventures as he his for his legendary actor status. Now in his 80s, Newman enjoys a near 50-year marriage to Joanne in Connecticut, their main residence since moving away from the bright lights of Hollywood in 1960, still attends races, is very much involved in his charitable organizations and in 2006 opened a restaurant called Dressing Room, which helps out the Westport Country Playhouse, a place the Newman&#8217;s take great pride in. In 2007 he made some headlines when he said he was losing his invention and confidence in his acting abilities and that acting is &#8220;pretty much a closed book for me.&#8221; Whether he&#8217;s on the screen or not, Paul Newman remains synonymous with the anti-heroism of the 1960s and 1970s cinema and rebellious nature his characters so often embodied. <a title="imdb.com" href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000056/bio" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<div align="center">
<hr align="center" size="2" width="45%" />
</div>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Cool Hand Luke</strong> &#8211; In pivotal scene #15 &#8216;Snake in the grass&#8217; Luke begins to challenge the authority of the prison guards &#8211; Fellow prisoner Dragline (played by George Kennedy) tells Luke &#8220;Luke, you&#8217;ve gone too far when you mess with [the guard] the man with no eyes&#8221; &#8211; Then in the next scene #16 &#8216;Standing in the rain&#8217; Luke begins to question not just the existence of God but also the fairness, goodness and abilities of God &#8211; &#8220;Let me know you&#8217;re up there Old Timer (God) love me, hate me, kill me just let me know you&#8217;re up there&#8221;<br />
Standing in the rain &#8216;talking to myself&#8217; is what Luke replies to himself after his brief dialogue with God. Luke in seeking and questioning the goodness, nature and existence of God is doing it in an open, just and meaningful way. Not like the blasphemous sinner hurling insults to cause injury but more in a serious way like a man who has lived life, questioned life, fought [WWII] and survived most of what life has thrown his way and yet is still seeking an honest and sincere answer. This brings to mind, is it more appropriate to have a polished, even pretend mega-church cultured relationship with God where it is more rehearsed among men than freely given to God. Or is it more acceptable to God for a person like Luke in prison with most of the odds stacked against him and yet in openness and honesty from time to time he addresses God and looks into the things of God.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Cool Hand Luke</strong> &#8211; Luke continues to challenge the authority of the prison system and after news of his Mother&#8217;s death and some resulting unfair treatment from the prison staff Luke attempts a first escape but is caught just a few days later and returned to camp &#8211; Luke now has two more years of time to do and a clinking set of leg chains &#8220;to slow him down&#8221;<br />
Chains on but not slowed down, Luke immediately escapes the work camp and is on the run for a second time. In scene #22 &#8216;Chili powder, etc.&#8217; Luke has escaped for a second time and has stopped at a familiar small farm owned by a black family. Two black kids who are friends with each other help Luke, one goes and gets an axe to cut the chains and the other gets chili powder for Luke to spread on the ground to hinder the scent and smell of the chasing prison dogs. As Luke sits down he puts his feet on a chopping block and begins to break his leg chains with the axe and for the viewer a building in the background comes into view. As Luke is chopping at his leg chains he pauses and briefly looks over his shoulder at the nondescript building. Returning to his chopping the building looms in the background the entire time until the chains are broken and Luke is free to continue on with his escape. The building in the background is a small Church building and it is where Luke will have his climatic showdown with both God and man.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Cool Hand Luke</strong> &#8211; Luke is captured and returned again to the prison camp where he receives two sets of leg chains and an unbearable amount of work and harassment from the prison staff &#8211; It appears that after all of the hardship that Luke has been broken &#8211; Luke has appeared to have &#8216;gotten religion&#8217; the kind of conforming obedient religion that one man seeks to place over another<br />
Now the obedient Luke is reduced to every humiliation at the hands of both the prison guards and his fellow prisoners. But not for long as Luke is immediately on the run again and this time his friend Dragline joins Luke in the escape. In the dark of the night Luke and Dragline near the small farming community where Luke cut his chains in the previous escape attempt. Dragline scouts the road and tells Luke that they have it made and can escape on to every imaginable pleasure. Luke declines to go with Dragline saying &#8220;I&#8217;ve done enough world shaking for a while&#8221; and going his own way Luke passes then enters into the small Church to have another conversation with the Old Man (God).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Cool Hand Luke</strong> &#8211; Luke talks with God &#8211; Luke assumes that all of his previous attempts at reaching God have failed &#8211; But just in reaching back to the previous &#8216;talking to myself&#8217; scene where Luke was shouting to God in a rainstorm Luke had told God &#8220;Let me know you&#8217;re up there Old Timer (God) love me, hate me, *kill me just let me know you&#8217;re up there&#8221; And now God in His goodness and kindness is about to let Luke know that He has had Luke in His loving hands all the time<br />
Within minutes of Luke&#8217;s seemingly failed attempt at reaching God the small Church parking lot is filled with police cars and his friend Dragline enters into the building to talk Luke into surrendering proclaiming &#8220;maybe they will even give us our old bunks back.&#8221; Luke realizing the seriousness of the situation walks over to the window and using the Warden&#8217;s own iconic words says &#8220;what we have here is a failure to communicate.&#8221; The guard called no eyes again does his talking with his rife and quickly responds by shooting and wounding Luke in the neck. The prison staff rejects an offer to take the badly wounded Luke to a nearby hospital ensuring Luke&#8217;s death and as the car pulls away the ever foreboding red light appears assuring the viewer that Luke has passed from this life. Had God not taken Luke&#8217;s life at that moment as Luke had given God an open invitation to do, what would be his condition mentally, emotionally, physically and spiritually after yet another session with the skilled prison staff? It would have been a Luke much different from the Luke God made and loved &#8220;You, made me like I am&#8221; and God did make Luke, in part like he was though sin also has a part in every person. The scene concludes with the smiling face of Luke and indeed it is a smile of a man who has overcome all the odds and perhaps it is the smile of a man that knowingly overcame this world and entered into the joy and presence of God in Heaven.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Cool Hand Luke</strong> &#8211; Occult symbolism &#8211; The movie is stuffed with imagery, innuendo and outright occult symbolism<br />
At the end of the famous egg eating contest a self-sacrificed Luke lays sprawled on top of the table in the obvious form of the crucified Christ [a pose that Newman would nearly duplicate in the movie Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid as Butch falls backward into a puddle of water during the film&#8217;s long chase scene]. Though mimicking Christ, in a unique way the pose and context is not extraordinarily Antichrist but instead is more of a man who identifies with Jesus and His sacrifice on the cross and not of a man who is taking the place of Christ. Throughout the movie the character of Luke does not take the nature of Antichrist [no miracles, extended blasphemy or self-anointing] but consistently continues in the theme of a sinner trying to reach out to God as opposed to the movie King Rat where Corporal King (a type of Satan) made the system and used the system for his gain &#8211; Cool Hand Luke instead was a part of the system and often a victim of the system. The film concludes with the prison chain-gang [now, once again without Luke] cutting the grass of the ditches along a crossroad intersection then the torn [in the shape of a cross] picture of Luke with the two women is placed directly over the crossroad intersection creating the occult double cross (treachery) symbolism. Lastly the movie camera zooms into the picture of Luke until only an eye of Luke is left visible in the viewing frame showing the occult one-eye of enlightenment copying the technique that was so often used in the previous movie The Good the Bad and the Ugly.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Cool Hand Luke &#8211; Conclusion:</strong> The effects on the modern Church from the 1960&#8217;s losing your religion movies of King Rat, The Good the Bad and the Ugly, Cool Hand Luke, etc.<br />
It is only fair and accurate to lay the demise of the modern Church, and the accompanying critically ill condition of the present Church, at the feet of the Pastors who have willingly, either knowingly or unknowingly, led the Church into this direction for now three generations of preaching, teaching and Church service since the 1960&#8217;s. The first generation of preachers and Church leaders during the 1960&#8217;s-1970&#8217;s consisting of men like Robert H. Schuller of Crystal Cathedral, Calvary Chapel&#8217;s Chuck Smith Sr., Hal Lindsey, Chuck Missler, Jerry Falwell Sr., Dr. James Dobson, Pat Robertson, Tim LaHaye, Bill Gaither, Billy Graham etc. though not being directly open with the Church harbored within themselves the thoughts and concepts of the occult themed movies enabling the second generation of preachers and leaders to become more boldly occult within the true Church. The second generation of preachers during the 1980&#8217;s-1990&#8217;s consisting of men like Rick warren, John MacArthur, John Piper, Chuck Smith Jr., Jerry Falwell Jr., Greg Laurie, Mike MacIntosh, Skip Heitzig, etc. teachers who more openly added and abetted the Occult influence into the true Christian Church. The third and also current generation [including the Basic Christian Ministry &#8211; though from this generation is not of this worldly generation] of preaching 2000&#8217;s-2010&#8217;s is now openly advocating the very Occult concepts of the 1960&#8217;s. In the Fall of 2010 Liberty University professor Ergun Caner began to publically address Christians as &#8216;haters&#8217; the very line from the ending of the movie King Rat where Peter Marlowe [twice for effect] calls the Christian Lieutenant Robin Grey a hater. Now in 2011 Pastor Perry Noble mimicking the deleted scene &#8216;6 the perfect number&#8217; from the occult movie The Good the Bad and the Ugly informs his members that &#8220;I think you officially suck as a human being&#8221; and just like Blondie from the movie if we don&#8217;t agree and acquiesce to Perry Noble and his every whim no matter how deranged then even our very life and existence is unworthy to be in his presence. Christianity in America and in the world has fallen a long way from the historical Christianity of the Bible, mostly in just the few short decades since the 1960&#8217;s. But what has been so quickly lost to the true Church can be even more quickly returned as Biblical fellowship, respect, honor, grace and the Lordship of Jesus Christ all return to the Church body exposing the unholy deeds of the occult darkness and lighting the world with the true Gospel of Jesus Christ!</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">by David Anson Brown</p>
<div align="center">
<hr align="center" size="2" width="45%" />
</div>
<p style="text-align: justify;">{Summer 2011 &#8211; Platform Project!} Basic Christian AIR (Version 2.54) &#8211; Available &#8211; as a FREE Download &#8211; Note: The &#8216;Adobe Air&#8217; document [BasicChristian.air] can be downloaded to any desktop computer (PC or Mac) and also on some of the newer phones (To download and install &#8211; Right click this link) {Note: This is the &#8216;Platform&#8217; Basic Christian resource format that I&#8217;m now using the most (though it doesn&#8217;t have the universal search feature of a PDF file). It has all the Basic Christian documents [Contents] easily accessible and it also has the ability for each user to change font sizes [lower right slide bar], add comments [Comments Pod] and **also a section to add your own &#8216;Platform&#8217; quick links [Favorites] to other websites a feature that I use daily to quickly visit several websites and blogs.}<br />
The project is now in the Summer 2011 Version. It will provide excellent anytime devotions and is perfect as a gift for others. Most importantly [with the free Adobe Air (2.7) program] the end user can create their own comments list, add links to other websites, blogs, RSS feeds, references and documents that once combined create an inclusive individual &#8216;Platform&#8217; for Christian research, devotional and study projects. &#8212; Now Available for Free Download! <a title="basicchristian.org" href="http://www.basicchristian.org/air/BasicChristian.air" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Adobe: Adobe AIR [an advanced Adobe Document (newer than PDF) Environment] Version 2.7 (Free Download)<br />
Note: The Air program from Adobe is much like the (PDF) Acrobat program from Adobe, both programs have to be installed on the computer before you can view Air Documents or PDF files. The Air program is a next generation file system and is more interactive than PDF files. <a title="adobe.com" href="http://get.adobe.com/air/" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<div align="center">
<hr align="center" size="2" width="45%" />
</div>
<p style="text-align: justify;">{4th of July, 2011} Bible verse: Psalms 145:9-14 The LORD is good to all: and His tender mercies are over all His works. &#8230; Thy Kingdom is an Everlasting Kingdom, and Thy dominion endureth throughout all generations. The LORD upholdeth all that fall, and raiseth up all those that be bowed down. {The complete Bible is available at ChristianFaithDownloads.com}<br />
Psalms 145:9-14 The LORD is good to all: and His tender mercies are over all His works. All thy works shall praise Thee, O LORD; and Thy saints shall bless thee. They shall speak of the glory of Thy Kingdom, and talk of Thy power; To make known to the sons of men His mighty acts, and the Glorious Majesty of His Kingdom. Thy Kingdom is an Everlasting Kingdom, and thy dominion endureth throughout all generations. The LORD upholdeth all that fall, and raiseth up all those that be bowed down. &#8212; Holy Bible <a title="ChristianFaithDownloads.com" href="http://www.ChristianFaithDownloads.com/" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">{4th of July, 2011} Bible verse: Proverbs 24:1-14 Be not thou envious against evil men, neither desire to be with them. For their heart studieth destruction, and their lips talk of mischief. ***Through wisdom is an house builded; and by understanding it is established [1 Timothy 3:15]: &#8230; If thou sayest, Behold, we knew it not; doth not He (God) that pondereth the heart [of man] consider it? and He (God) that keepeth thy soul, doth not He know it? and shall not He render to every man according to his works? {The complete Bible is available at ChristianFaithDownloads.com}<br />
Proverbs 24:1-14 Be not thou envious against evil men, neither desire to be with them. For their heart studieth destruction, and their lips talk of mischief. Through wisdom is an house builded; and by understanding it is established: And by knowledge shall the chambers be filled with all precious and pleasant riches. A wise man is strong; yea, a man of knowledge increaseth strength. For by wise counsel thou shalt make thy war: and in multitude of counsellors there is safety. Wisdom is too high for a fool: he openeth not his mouth in the gate. He that deviseth to do evil shall be called a mischievous person. The thought of foolishness is sin: and the scorner is an abomination to men. If thou faint in the day of adversity, thy strength is small. If thou forbear to deliver them that are drawn unto death, and those that are ready to be slain; If thou sayest, Behold, we knew it not; doth not he that pondereth the heart consider it? and he that keepeth thy soul, doth not he know it? and shall not he render to every man according to his works? My son, eat thou honey, because it is good; and the honeycomb, which is sweet to thy taste: So shall the knowledge of wisdom be unto thy soul: when thou hast found it, then there shall be a reward, and thy expectation [life everlasting] shall not be cut off. &#8212; Holy Bible <a title="ChristianFaithDownloads.com" href="http://www.ChristianFaithDownloads.com/" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<div align="center">
<hr align="center" size="2" width="45%" />
</div>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Wikipedia: King Rat &#8211; King Rat is a 1965 World War II film adapted from the James Clavell novel King Rat &#8211; The film was directed by Bryan Forbes and starred George Segal as Corporal King, a World War II prisoner of war in a squalid camp near Singapore &#8211; [consisting of anti-religious overtones] the movie was nominated for two Academy Awards {Note: An excellent true life-human drama movie realistically portraying life in a WWII POW camp.}<br />
Plot: Corporal King is an anomaly in the Japanese prison camp; not only is he one of only a handful of Americans amongst the mainly British and Australian inmates, he is actually thriving through his conniving and black market enterprises while others (nearly all of higher rank) struggle to survive the sickness and starvation, while retaining as much of their civilized nature as they can. &#8230; King has an entirely different relationship with the lower-class, seemingly-incorruptible [devout Christian] British Provost, Lieutenant Grey (Tom Courtenay). Grey has only contempt for the American and does his best to bring him down, with little success. &#8212; Meanwhile, Grey has another dilemma to deal with. When he accidentally discovers that the high-ranking officer in charge of the meager food rations has been siphoning off part of it, he rejects a bribe and zealously takes the matter to Colonel George Smedley-Taylor (John Mills). To his dismay however, Smedley-Taylor tells him that the corrupt officer and his assistant have been relieved of their duties, but orders him to forget all about it. Grey accuses him of being in on the scheme, but the tampered weight he presented to the colonel has been replaced, and he no longer has any proof of the misdeeds. Smedley-Taylor offers to promote him to captain; when a troubled Grey does not respond, Smedley-Taylor takes his silence as agreement. &#8212; Finally, one day, the camp commandant summons the senior British officers and notifies them that the Japanese have surrendered and that the war is over. Later, a single British paratrooper (Richard Dawson) walks up to the prison gates and disarms the guards. &#8212; After overcoming their shock and disbelief, the prisoners celebrate &#8211; all except King. He realizes he is no longer the unquestioned (if unofficial) ruler of the camp. He manages to squelch a premature attempt by resentful underling Sergeant Max (Patrick O&#8217;Neal) to reassert his rank and authority, but that only delays the inevitable. When Marlowe speaks to him before his departure back into the ranks of the U.S. Army, King ignores his overture of renewed friendship. &#8212; King&#8217;s unit sleeve patch is that of the U.S. 34th Infantry Division, which fought the Germans in North Africa and Italy, not the Japanese.<br />
<a title="wikipedia.org" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Rat_(film)" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">imdb: King Rat (1965) Movie &#8211; A viewer rating of 7.6 stars out of 10 stars<br />
The Japanese prisoner-of-war camp Changi in Singapore, which houses Allied POWs, is a living hell. The great mass of POWs are living at a sub-human subsistence level. US Army Corporal King has been living up to his surname, through his control of the camp&#8217;s black market, and by scamming the officers and other POWs. King has a facility for making deals with the Japanese to obtain the contraband he sells to the POWs. His nemesis is British Lieutenant Robin Grey, the camp provost marshal, a humorless, intense martinet who survives through his strict adherence to the British articles of war, which forbid collaboration with the enemy. He is suspicious of King, and is determined to catch him and bring him to justice. The humorless Grey is an upright, uptight moral prig who has been as badly damaged psychologically as any of the other POWs. The high-living King befriends a genteel young British soldier, Peter Marlowe, who at first resists his blandishments, and then succumbs, to his charm. The POWs become aware that the war is drawing to its end, and King and Marlowe grow concerned that the brutal Japanese guards may slaughter the prisoners before they can be liberated. King and Marlowe are determined to raise a large amount of money to buy their freedom by bribing their captors. One of the schemes that King devises is to raise the meat of deer mouse, a native delicacy, to sell to the officers and any POW who can afford it. Conditions are so desperate in the camp, that POWs are stealing rations form one another in order to stave off starvation. This is another one of King&#8217;s scams, as the &#8220;mouse deer&#8217; are actually rats, the breeding stock for which have been the rats that have fed off the corpses of dead POWs. The desperate situation in the camp is exacerbated by the brutality of the Japanese guards, and by the senior British officers&#8217; predilection for breaking the will of the POWs in order to maintain camp discipline. Resistance, thus, is futile, and with no other outlet, the animosity of the POWs has to be channeled against each other. It becomes quite apparent that, aside from Lieutenant Grey and the dead, everyone in the camp is corrupt. Corporal King merely stands out, as he is Jack-the-Lad, The King-of-the-Hill, King of the Camp, KING RAT. Written by Jon C. Hopwood &#8212; Trivia: Some of the actors had been POWS in the Second World War. Denholm Elliott, while serving in the RAF, had been shot down and taken prisoner by the Nazis. <a title="imdb.com" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0059358/" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">King Rat the Movie part 1 of 10 (YouTube)<br />
Note: Youtube has removed parts 2-10. <a title="youtube.com" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7TacnhnO7Q" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">King Rat &#8211; Edward Trimnell discusses James Clavell&#8217;s 1962 debut novel, &#8216;King Rat&#8217; &#8211; &#8220;What is good, what is evil? &#8211; How do people interact?&#8221; &#8211; &#8220;The novel is not an adventure script but is primarly a book of ideas&#8221; (YouTube)<br />
King Rat is set in a Japanese POW camp in 1945. This video introduces the two major characters of King Rat, as well as the themes explored in the book. From EdwardTrimnell.com. <a title="youtube.com" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BgmSxsuE9Q" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie Review-Repost of &#8220;The Good, the Bad and the Ugly&#8221; (1966)</title>
		<link>http://the-jesus-realm.com/wordpress/2013/01/12/movie-review-repost-of-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-1966/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Anson Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 12:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[David Anson Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decoded Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-jesus-realm.com/wordpress/?p=47</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Originally Posted in 2011 about May &#8211; June at BasicChristian.org by David Anson Brown The BasicChristian.org website&#8217;s decoding of the 1966 movie &#8220;The Good, the Bad and the Ugly&#8221; by Italian film director Sergio Leone A bounty hunting scam joins two men in an uneasy alliance against a third in a race to find a&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Originally Posted in 2011 about May &#8211; June at <a href="http://www.basicchristian.org/frame_blog_historystudy.html" target="_blank">BasicChristian.org</a><br />
by David Anson Brown</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>The BasicChristian.org website&#8217;s decoding of the 1966 movie &#8220;The Good, the Bad and the Ugly&#8221; by Italian film director Sergio Leone</strong><br />
A bounty hunting scam joins two men in an uneasy alliance against a third in a race to find a fortune in gold buried in a remote cemetery. (filmed in Italy, extended version released in Europe in 1966, an edited version was released in the USA in 1968, an almost completely restored-extended version was released in 2003 on DVD) &#8211; imdb.com. <a title="BasicChristian.org" href="http://basicchristian.org/frame_blog_historystudy.html" target="_blank">[link]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Background</strong> &#8211; Decoding &#8220;The Good, the Bad and the Ugly&#8221; by Italian film director Sergio Leone<br />
Why is there a need and what is the relevance of looking at this particular movie? Recently I was listening to a Current Events discussion and interview on a Christian podcast &#8211; the person being interviewed though unprompted launched into a standard End Time Armageddon scenario. It was the same Armageddon scenario that is so routinely submitted by so many End Time &#8211; Watchman ministries that most people assume that the current Armageddon scenario is factually based on well researched Christian doctrine. However the reality is that the current Armageddon scenario is anything but Biblically based and seemingly the way it is dogmatically rendered on Christian radio and in End Time Ministries the Armageddon scenario is actually an occult scenario that has entered into the Christian Church. Lest people say that there is no occult End Time Armageddon scenario we are going to examine the 1966 movie &#8220;The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly&#8221; a movie that actually depicts and blueprints all of America&#8217;s military wars and engagements from the Civil War up until an Armageddon scenario put forth in the movie&#8217;s climatic showdown scene set in a fictitious cemetery, a massive graveyard called &#8220;Sand Hill&#8221; i.e. the sand hills of the &#8220;Middle-East&#8221; and Armageddon. Also, if anyone disagrees that this occult scenario has entered into the Christian Church just remember that the movie came out in 1966 &amp; 1968 and then later in 1970 the book &#8220;The Late, Great Planet Earth&#8221; by Hal Lindsey came out followed by numerous other authors such as Chuck Missler all following the movie&#8217;s Armageddon scenario and then blueprinting that Occult scenario into the Christian Church as a modern End Time doctrine for Evangelical Christianity.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Plot Summary 1</strong><br />
The movie uses a part historical and part fictitious American Civil War setting in order to orchestrate and illustrate (instruct) what is presumably a desired occult outcome to global affairs. The movie has three main characters and several sub-characters; all of whom we will examine in detail later. The three main characters though monikered as &#8216;The Good&#8217;, &#8216;The Bad&#8217; and &#8216;The Ugly&#8217; are each unveiled in the opening scenes of the movie as equally undistinguishable in their vicious, mean, stubborn and underhanded day to day lives. The movie plot follows the lives of the three figures, The Good &#8211; The Bad &#8211; The Ugly as they each compete to gain sole possession of a fortune [the earth&#8217;s wealth] in buried [payroll] gold.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Plot Summary 2</strong><br />
About half way through the movie the scenes follow a series of wartime events and battles. Each scene event depicts a different war in American history. Starting with a brief scene where a Civil War Union solider &#8216;thief&#8217; is executed by a formation of Union Soldiers firing into the condemned man at a very close range. This is actually the only scene that depicts a Civil War era combat event in the movie and apparently the occult lesson is that the Civil War was actually an execution of soldiers on both sides in the war, in the intent and extent of the way that the war was fought. After the brief Civil War era execution scene the plot quickly shifts to a city destroyed by war but not the Civil War in the movie&#8217;s depiction it is now the wars of Europe WWI &amp; WWII. The bomb (shell) that explodes in the middle of the street is a WWI era &#8216;whistling&#8217; bomb and explosion {bombs in WWI often had a whistle type of noisemaker attached to them to provide an additional psychological fear factor to the bombing and shelling, a practice that was also initially practiced early in WWII but was soon ended as WWII soon opted for much more tonnage of bombs in order to achieve the additional fear factor instead of the fewer but nosier bombs of WWI.} &#8211; After the WWI view of the city and the bomb explosion in the center of the street the same scene adopts a WWII style as now the men &#8216;attack&#8217; through the destroyed city by walking down both sides of the street in a typical WWII military formation and while going down the street encounter a &#8216;sniper&#8217; depicting the ever present German snipers of WWII, the character Tuco utters one word in the scene &#8220;hold&#8221; very similar in sound to German word &#8220;halt&#8221;. The WWII era scene also depicted a man reading a book (very common of the WWII generation) and also includes a scene where a dead man&#8217;s shirt is lifted up revealing in appearance a WWII German rife or machinegun wound and not the pistol wound of the movie (and one of the characters comments &#8220;he must have shot him at close range&#8221; in order to help cover that the wound is too large for a Civil War era pistol wound). Apparently the occult lesson is that WWI and WWII were intended to destroy large cities and in the process endanger, destabilize and shift (relocate) huge populations of civilians.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Plot Summary 3</strong><br />
After departing the badly war-torn city two of the characters on route to their destination are &#8216;captured&#8217; and forcibly taken to yet another military engagement. This time the military battle is a depiction of the war in Korea as the scenery is now hills with sparsely covered vegetation (characteristic of Korea). Much of the later Korean War [up until the ending stalemate] was fought from small trenches dug along the hills with accompanying artillery positions also dug into the hills. The river in the scene is depicting the Yule River that the Chinese crossed to enter the Korean war. The movie is depicting American and Chinese forces fighting on the bridge. The Captain, younger than the WWII aged men in the previous scene [more on this later] is of the age of a Korean War veteran (in 1966) and acts the part of an Army officer in Korea, his (shrapnel and bayonet) wounds and the treatment of them (a mountain of gauze) are characteristic of the Korean War. Apparently the occult lesson is that Korea was fought to (secretly) bring down bridges and separators between Nations and populations i.e. a global economy. &#8211; Note: In the actual Korean War when Marines of the 1st Marine Division raised the American flag in victory during the Battle of Seoul in Korea and within hours of hearing about it American General Douglas MacArthur ordered that the American flag was to be removed and the U.N. flag flown in its place and the order was reluctantly carried out by the troops at the scene. &#8211; Also Note: Ray L. Walker, USMC veteran of the Korean War &#8220;I was there and I recall it well. Including the attempt by an army color guard to remove the American Flag we flew in Seoul and replace it with a U.N. flag. The result was a flag pole we shot to hell &#8211; no flag flew from that pole anymore [though the U.N. flag did replace the American flag as ordered in other places]. History depends on who&#8217;s telling it. Usually non-combatants working from official documents.&#8221; &#8211; Source: www.koreanwar-educator.org/topics/brief/brief_account_of_the_korean_war.htm</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Plot Summary 4</strong><br />
Crossing over what remains of the destroyed bridge the two characters find a vastly different scenery (and a different war) on the other side of the river. The scenery is now the lush green (jungle) of the then current (1966) war in Vietnam. Spread among the ground are the bodies not of rebel soldiers but the bodies of attacking Viet Cong from the previous night&#8217;s battle (much of the fighting in Vietnam was at night). One of the characters comes across a very young (Vietnam veteran age in 1966) and very badly wounded solider. The character covers the wounded solider with his own jacket in a scene very typical of a wounded soldier in Vietnam being covered by a poncho from his fellow soliders to help comfort the wounded solider while a medevac helicopter was on its way and as depicted in the movie often the solider died in the presence of friends {Note: Vietnam veterans actually intimately encountered more death of fellow soldiers than the WWII veterans who were busy attacking through objectives and later saw the dead bodies of close friends, while soldiers in Vietnam died in the arms and presence of one another often while waiting for a medevac.} &#8211; In the Vietnam scene the primary scene of destruction is of a badly destroyed and now unusable Church building. Apparently the occult lesson is that Vietnam was fought to completely destroy a Christian based society in America. With the Christian Church now in ruins the character Tuco is now literally blasted from one cannon shot after another [one conflict after another] into the cemetery of &#8216;Sand Hill&#8217; setting up the desired Armageddon outcome. &#8211; Note: Defense Sectary Robert McNamara (during the Vietnam war) was a major architect and proponent of extending American involvement in Vietnam and McNamara is quoted on film as saying that if America withdraws (early) from the conflict in Vietnam that the desired social changes [government regulations, taxation, controls, oversight and surveillance] in America could not be achieved in peacetime as easily as they could in wartime.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Character Summary</strong><br />
The three main characters in the movie &#8220;The Good, the Bad and the Ugly&#8221; in the order that they first appear in the movie. 1. Eli Wallach &#8211; Tuco (the ugly) Tuco aka &#8216;the rat&#8217; however Tuco is apparently the Spanish word for a small rodent that burrows into the ground while &#8216;la rata&#8217; is apparently the Spanish translation of rat as in a rodent. 2. Lee Van Cleef &#8211; Angel Eyes (the bad). 3. Clint Eastwood &#8211; Blondie (the Good) note that the Clint Eastwood character is not an actual blond in the movie so the title &#8216;Blondie&#8217; is not an actual title but is a figurative title as the names Tuco and Angle Eyes are also primarily figurative and representational names. In the movie Blondie represents of course the Arian (enlightened) species the Occultists. Tuco a species that burrows into the ground represents the Middle-East Arab Muslim oil Nations. Angel Eyes (someone who is supposedly heavenly focused) represents the people who control and manipulate the Christian Church i.e. a Pastor. In short the three main characters in the movie are an Occultist, a Muslim and a Christian.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Angel Eyes 1</strong><br />
In an early scene in the movie Angel Eyes&#8217; first appearance is at the home of a wounded and recovering solider. Angel Eyes is looking for information on behalf of another person and during the conversation Angel Eyes learns that it is information about a stolen and buried payroll that is really the information attached to the name he was attempting to discover for his client. &#8211; Angel Eyes pauses at the entrance of the house before going in and in appearance Angel Eyes at first sight appears to look like a Missionary [instead of the dangerous gunman that he is] and indeed Angel Eyes has a big cloth bandanna draped around his neck to indicate subtly that he is a man of the cloth a Christian. Sitting down and eating the other man&#8217;s food Angel Eyes picks up the bread and cuts off a piece of it, he holds the piece of bread in one hand (as in holding communion) and is filmed in a deliberate act of eating the bread (taking communion) further establishing Angel Eyes as a figure representing Christianity. Later Angel Eyes will be seen drinking from a cup (concluding his communion) and the (communion) cup will appear and be staged as a prop in the final Armageddon scene.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Tuco 1</strong><br />
Tuco Ramírez (full name: Tuco Benedicto Pacífico Juan María Ramírez &#8211; wiki.com) The character Tuco representing the Islam character has a long difficult name to pronounce like a Muslim generally has a difficult name for Westerners to pronounce. When Tuco is apprehended and brought into the Sheriff&#8217;s office the first time Tuco utters a continuous stream of Arab type of proverbs against his captor, his captor&#8217;s father and his captor&#8217;s mother. It is revealed later in the movie that Tuco actually has a brother that is a Catholic Priest in charge of the local Catholic Missionary enclave [Islam and Catholicism as brothers]. Tuco [representing Islam] remarks to his Catholic Priest brother that he is unfamiliar with the Catholic ways and simply kisses the tassel of his brother&#8217;s robe in a feigned attempt at admiration. In the Catholic Mission Tuco finds himself facing a portrait of a crucified Jesus Christ and upon seeing the picture Tuco begins to pray [possibly earnestly for a second] but then quickly and irreverently he takes out a bottle of whiskey and drains it in front of the portrait. &#8211; The genuinely good natured Tuco as a type of Islam he is repeatedly used [his neck constantly in and out of nooses] throughout the movie resulting from the scams and moneymaking cons of others to the point that Tuco really knows no other way of existing and making a living.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Blondie 1</strong><br />
Blondie enters the movie in a scene just in time to save Tuco from being captured by other bounty hunters. Blondie is anonymous and is first heard without being seen and then is seen only from behind (his entire face is hidden as he talks and when he shoots) the first act of Blondie is [occult] to call down fire from heaven (well, actually to strike a match and light his cigar) he then proceeds to kill a trinity of three men. Blondie aka &#8220;Man with No Name&#8221; is also known as Judas when Tuco calls him by his name &#8216;Judas&#8217; at the Sherriff&#8217;s office &#8220;Judas you sold my hide.&#8221; Blondie aka Judas is monikered in the movie with his label of &#8220;The Good&#8221; at the very moment that Judas or Blondie has just preformed his most devious, sadistic and underhanded task in abandoning a tied up Tuco in the wilderness. Certainly the label of &#8220;The Good&#8221; is not intended to imply compassion or goodness of any kind but is implying that Blondie/Judas is good at being devious.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Meddler</strong><br />
After the opening credits the first scene in the movie is of a man (meddler &#8211; a *Don Quixote type figure) who pops-up awkwardly into the viewing frame as if he is an arcade game pop-up toy who&#8217;s only intention is to be unceremoniously knocked down again. Indecently &#8216;meddler&#8217; is a biological blondie however he is nothing of the spiritual Occult Blondie that the movie intends to portray. Unsurprisingly within moments the meddler and his two companions are indeed meddling in the affairs of Tuco, Angel Eyes and Blondie as the unfortunate meddling trio attempts to apprehend Tuco but the shifty Tuco easily dispatches two of them wounding the third and easily escapes being captured by them. Later in the movie meddler again bumps into Tuco and again tries to apprehend Tuco and seek vengeance for his previous wound from Tuco. Upon encountering Tuco the often offended meddler immediately rehearses a long list of grievances and desires that he has intended to visit upon Tuco but Tuco simply shoots him down like the pop-up target he has always been. Meddler or a Don Quixote figure is a very important figure in Occult teachings and supposedly the famed Skull &amp; Bones Society of Yale University has only three items of interest within their society walls the first being a human skull (death and Satan worship) the second being a Black (Satanic) Pope [instituting a Satanic Pope over the Catholic Church] and the third being a statue of a Don Quixote figure. &#8212; &#8220;Proverbs 20:3 It is an honour for a man to cease from strife: but every fool will be meddling.&#8221; &#8211; &#8220;Psalms 14:1 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.&#8221; &#8212; &#8220;Psalms 11:7 For the righteous LORD loveth righteousness; His countenance doth behold the upright.&#8221; &#8211; &#8220;James 5:16 Confess your faults one to another, and pray one for another, that ye may be healed. The effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Catholic Priest</strong><br />
Tuco&#8217;s brother the Catholic Priest upon recognizing Tuco immediately launches into his own private crusade against [the Muslim] Tuco. Tuco then does reveal to his brother that indeed he is a [Muslim] man with many wives (i.e. a harem) and the two have a minor altercation among brothers. In a very touching scene the Catholic Priest does rightly repent of his treatment towards Tuco and quietly [out of sight of Tuco] asks for Tuco&#8217;s forgiveness for the previous crusade. Note: The Catholic Mission is portrayed in the movie as a place where both sides in the professed war (good and evil) can freely enter in and receive from the resources of the Mission. How interesting that the Occult scenario is that the Catholic Church should administer its Priestly duties without any Priestly discernment as though the only two options in Christian Ministry are complete acquiesce and acceptance of all things evil or of an over the top unwarranted crusade against every small appearance and detail of evil.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Jew<br />
</strong>The man named Baker [as in Jewish Matzoh &#8211; baked unleavened bread] is portrayed primarily by his Jewish facial features. The Jew is stereotypically depicted as being infirmed, greedy, lazy and in immediate possession of a handful of cash. Angel Eyes [Christian authority] is portrayed as working for Baker, as an unwilling servant to the Jew, it is Baker [the mythical Jewish conspiracy] that ultimately employs and pays Angel Eyes his wages. In the movie plot Angel Eyes has discovered another way to make money via the new information of a buried [payroll] treasure and he quickly kills the Jew seemingly having gained his own independence. Amazingly in the movie Angel Eyes after needlessly killing the Jew, then Angel Eyes clutches the lamp of the Jew and blows out the lamp, the light of the Jew is now extinguished but it was also his only source of light and Angel Eyes is left standing in utter darkness foretelling of his own impending destruction. How informative that when Christianity removes the Jewish nature of the Bible, of Christianity and of God revealed to mankind that indeed Christianity has darkened the only light it will ever know.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Batterville</strong><br />
Angel Eyes had discovered that his best opportunity to find more information regarding the buried [payroll] treasure would be at the Prisoner of War camp Batterville and has placed himself in authority as the Sargent in charge at Batterville. Angel Eyes is looking for the one last living person, a solider originally named Jackson but who was now going under the assumed name of Bill Carson, who was the only living clue left as to where the treasure was buried. Batterville is an amazing place, it is a place where Angel Eyes thinks he is in complete authority, able to conduct his own business in his own way. Batterville is the exact Occult scenario of how an Occult influenced [treasure seeking] Christian Church should be run. The prisoners [Christians unfortunate enough to land in Angel Eyes&#8217; greedy Mega-Church chapel] are abused, malnourished, neglected, tormented and mistreated at every available opportunity by Angel Eyes and his personally selected staff of enforcers. In a prominent scene in the movie at the aptly named Batterville [where all who enter are battered and beaten] Angel Eyes and his staff are seen in their luxurious accommodations having just taken up a collection [robbing the people of their last cent] from among the newly arrived prisoners. The collection pile is spread out on top of the table and Angel Eyes and his co-conspirators lament that the pile of money and goods wasn&#8217;t as large as they would have liked it to have been but just the same the pile of money is scooped up into a sack and sent outside the camp [where it will no longer be of any use to the prisoners] through a convenient side window in the office. Angel Eyes insists that the camp&#8217;s &#8216;praise and worship&#8217; band begin to play, not that praise and worship will help the downtrodden prisoners all that much but Angel Eyes has learned that even a half-descent praise band will go a long way in helping to cover and conceal the multitude of crimes and indiscretions perpetrated by Angel Eyes and his staff against the honest prisoners of the camp and indeed Angel Eyes sees no reason to release any meaningful financial statements or insert any oversight of any kind into his daily proceedings, a tactic that quickly breaks the morale and destroys the will to resist of all the many prisoners in his beloved kingdom of Batterville. Angel Eyes is called before the Camp Officer the true Camp authority the Commandant [a type of Jesus Christ] but Angel Eyes sees the true authority as diseased (a wound that has not healed and has turned to gangrene) and Angel Eyes simply scoffs and wishes the Commandant &#8220;good luck&#8221; in his desire of bringing justice, fair treatment and accountably to Batterville and to the entire Army for that matter [though Angle Eyes should have stuck around and come back to the Camp Commandant (Jesus Christ) on the third day and he would have found Him not injured on the cross and not in the grave as he suspected but completely healed and in complete authority]. Angel Eyes does locate the information of Bill Carson but it happens to be Tuco that now has the name of Bill Carson and knows the location of the cemetery where the treasure is buried. Angel Eyes invites Tuco into his office for fellowship and a free agape meal together. Tuco suspecting that the meal is poison is reluctant at first but then dives in with a large appetite and an equally large spoon. Interestingly enough the feast Angel Eyes provides has no cups to drink from and no wine to drink but only whisky to drink and bowls to drink from and both men drink from the bowls of wrath filled to the brim. The cup [communion cup] will come later. True to his nature and desires Angel Eyes quickly instructs an assistant to pummel Tuco into submission while the camp praise band begins playing in the background intending to cover the crime though the scheme fools few.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Arch Stanton</strong><br />
Tuco is incorrectly told by Blondie that the fortune of wealth is buried in a grave with the name of Arch Stanton on the grave marker when actually the treasure in the movie is buried in the grave next to (on the left side) of the grave marked Arch Stanton. Tuco at first digging through the sand with a board borrowed from the grave on the left and with his bare hands uncovers the coffin of Arch Stanton. Blondie being little help tosses an almost finished Tuco a shovel at the last moment and just as the coffin of Arch Stanton is about to be opened to reveal its contents who should appear tossing in another shovel none other than Angle Eyes himself. The grave is opened by Tuco to reveal not treasure but a skeleton the bones of Arch Stanton [in the Occult the Archangel Satan is the ruler of the dead]. Blondie proclaims that the three will have to work [kill] for the treasure, and actually it&#8217;s dance for the treasure because what follows is an amazing dance of the Devil that is conducted within an Occult circle by the three participants. &#8211; Grave markers &#8211; There are primarily three types of grave markers in Sand Hill cemetery. The short rounded top gravestone familiar to all graveyards, there are many Christian crosses also a familiar site in graveyards and at the fictional Sand Hill cemetery there is a common third type of grave marker it is a dual plank grave marker that when weather aged or assembled shoddily actually comes separates at the top and reveals a distinct occult V at the top of the marker. Arch Stanton happens to be buried in an occult marked grave and it has the distinct occult V located at the top. The name Arch Stanton (Archangel Satan) leaves no doubt that the grave is of occult origin. The grave on the left of Arch Stanton the grave with the treasure to be plundered is marked with a cross. When the skeleton of Arch Stanton [a type of Satan] is exposed it shows a skull that is turned to the left keeping watch on the treasure in the accompanying grave.</p>
<div align="center">
<hr align="center" size="2" width="45%" />
</div>
<p style="text-align: justify;">WHAT&#8217;S GOING ON WITH DR. JOHN PIPER? {Note: About the Occult V (Victory, Vendetta) symbol &#8211; Shortly after the American Civil War the Occult symbol K came into prominence in America and especially in the just defeated Confederate States. In Occult lingo a more highly dedicated occultist would choose more K&#8217;s i.e. the symbol KKK. However the symbol KKK quickly became detestable in all of America and went out of style. The ancient Occult symbol V always remained in prominence in Europe and like the KKK of America a European Occultist would add multiple V&#8217;s and actually create the W &#8211; Therefor an Occult W is equal to an Occult KKK &#8211; Here is a recent photo of Pastor John Piper flashing the Occult W sign.} (Photo)<br />
In Rick Warren To Be Featured At Desiring God 2010 &#8211; I was among the few who broke the story that Dr. Piper had made the ill-advised decision to invite Leadership Network&#8217;s propped-up Purpose Driven Pope Rick Warren to DG 2010 as a keynote speaker. Then, as I shared in Rick Warren Doctrinal And Sound?, unfortunately it got even worse when Dr. Piper decided to defend his decision: At root I think [Rick Warren] is theological and doctrinal and sound. &#8230; So whether one even knows it or not, Warrengate still is slowly simmering; Dr. Piper&#8217;s choice here has had the rippling effect of people, even outside of any discernment ministries, beginning to look a little closer at his theology, educational background, and associations; e.g. his charismatic bent, his connection to Fuller Theological Seminary, and with the late Ralph Winter. I had received a tip from a source back in June of this past year; and as I followed up on it, it would eventually lead me to discover some disturbing information which I orginally began sharing in Questions Concerning Dr. John Piper and Dr. John Piper And Unanswered Questions. When I wrote those initial articles Dr. Piper was on his much talked about sabbatical; now however, he is back and a few of the mystic books I pointed in the latter piece are no longer in the BBC online library. &#8230; What I just showed you here should give us real concern as the obstensibly Reformed, &#8220;happy,&#8221; and &#8220;romantic,&#8221; Calvinist Dr. John Piper is sounding less like a charismatic and more like a mystic as he points us to apostate teachers of Roman Catholicism and its spiritually bankrupt mysticism; and from what we can see, this has been going on for quite some time now. Perhaps, now that his discernment is so far off he&#8217;s even promoting the double-minded Rick Warren, the time has finally arrived for some of his DG speakers to take a closer look at what&#8217;s going on in this neo-Reformed camp. <a title="apprising.org" href="http://apprising.org/2011/01/17/whats-going-on-with-dr-john-piper/" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<div align="center">
<hr align="center" size="2" width="45%" />
</div>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>6 the perfect number</strong><br />
After Angel Eyes and Blondie depart the Prisoner of War camp Batterville [now equal partners in search of the treasure at least that&#8217;s what Angel Eyes thinks] the two camp out by a river and in the morning it is revealed that Angel Eyes has a gang of friends who have come to meet him. One of them is shot by Blondie before he can even enter the camp site. Angel Eyes tells the rest of the &#8220;boys&#8221; to come out, Blondie counts them all including Angel Eyes and declares that the six of them make a perfect number because his gun has six bullets. Blondie says the word six exactly three times &#8220;&#8230; five, six &#8230; that&#8217;s six &#8230; six bullets in my gun&#8221; for a complete 666. As Blondie is counting and reaches the sixth person who happens to be Angel Eyes just as Blondie counts six and implying all of their deaths Angel Eyes is drinking from his cup completing his communion. Note: This one small seemingly innocent scene is perhaps the most important scene in the entire movie in order to decode the movie and it is one of only two scenes that Sergio Leone edited out of the [1968] American version. Leone might have figured the movie could have been easily decoded by American audiences so the scene was deleted along with an earlier scene with Tuco that comes off as highly socialist. The decoding elements in the campsite scene are two, first each face of the men is clearly shown as they are each counted and each one is about the same age as the others, each man is the age and appearance of a WWII veteran in 1966. The movie audience in America would have easily picked up that all the men in the scene were of WWII age and with the coming destroyed city scene would have realized that the movie had departed the Civil War era motif and had entered a WWI and WWII motif and could have easily placed the next two scenes as Korea and Vietnam. The other deleted element in the same scene is the drinking from the cup. It was probably even more important for Sergio Leone to cut and cover up the scenario that the bad guy represented in the movie was his representation of Christianity. Without seeing Angel Eyes deliberately drinking from the cup it becomes difficult for the audience to combine the earlier eating of the bread with the cup making for a completed Communion sequence and perhaps most important of all by cutting the scene Sergio Leone doesn&#8217;t have to explain why suddenly Communion cups show up on the mass graves of dead Christians in his ending Armageddon scene [leaving no doubt that it&#8217;s a Christian massacre that Sergio Leone is depicting in the mass graves at Sand Hill cemetery]. Note: Angel Eyes (Lee Van Cleef) served in the U.S. Navy aboard minesweepers and subchasers during World War II. Source imdb.com.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Enabler</strong><br />
The complicit enabler though not generally mean, evil or underhanded like the three main characters in the movie it is the acceptance, actions and abilities of the usually unaware complicit enabler that allow all of the coming events of massive carnage and destruction to so easily and continually take place. We first meet the complicit character in scene #13 titled &#8220;Southern Cuisine&#8221;. Angel Eyes is out riding his horse and looking for clues to the whereabouts of Bill Carson when he comes across a small Confederate outpost. Most of the men are badly injured and are in much pain and are suffering much however one man is not sharing their pain and misfortune, that man is the enabler [the unscrupulous; politician, recruiter, defense contractor, etc.] Welcome! It is the first word of the enabler cheerfully spoken to a befuddled Angel Eyes. Enabler is not a solider himself, he has no weapon, he is wearing an empty pistol holster a holster that is placed too far back on the hip to be the dress of a real solider. Enabler doesn&#8217;t see the pain, the loss or the tragedy instead he sees the comedy, the money, the travel, the experiences, and the opportunity. Angel Eyes quickly knows how to deal with this type of man and gives him a bottle of cheap whiskey in exchange for all the information the man has. A last close-up of the man while he is sitting guzzling his precious bottle of cheap booze reveals that the closer we get to this man and the more we see of him the less appealing he becomes. Note: the amazing song that is being played in the background of the scene is the Christian Hymn &#8220;Were You There?&#8221; some of the words are &#8220;Were you there when they crucified my Lord? &#8230; It makes me WONDER, Wonder, wonder&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Family</strong><br />
The one intact family in the movie is represented by the Stevens family [Stephen the first Church martyr &#8211; Acts 7:59]. No first name is given the family is simply represented as a whole. The unnamed patriarch of the Stevens family is a wounded solider a farmer who is back to farming his land and recovering from his wounds received during his service in the war. Angel Eyes appears at the doorway and for a while it is uncertain if Angel Eyes is a friend or a foe. Walking towards the seated Stevens the accessible and ready to be used gun in the belt of Angel Eyes is now plainly visible and all hope of him being a friend is removed. Angel Eyes seats himself down and begins eating Stevens&#8217; food and looking at a small family picture on the wall Angel Eyes asks &#8220;is that your family&#8221; Stevens replies &#8220;yes&#8221; Angel Eyes responds with a laugh and says &#8220;nice family.&#8221; Stevens comments that Angel Eyes is there to murder him and offers to pay him a $1,000 &#8220;some in gold&#8221; Angel Eyes looks at the money and says &#8220;a tidy (tithe) sum&#8221; takes the money and then proceeds to gun down the elderly family man. Shockingly the movie being an Occult blueprint for the destruction of the Church and family has depicted that Church Ministry is to be the determined tool to destroy the family as a viable unit. Angel Eyes then proceeds to kill the firstborn son and as he leaves a devastated family behind him the distraught mother and her younger son run into the room she screams and collapses.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Upsidedown cross</strong><br />
In one of the early scenes as Angel Eyes rides onto the Stevens&#8217; property the youngest son is riding a donkey that is dumping water into a field. Adjacent to the donkey water pumping station is a decorative rock mosaic circle [it is identical to the mosaic rock circle in the final Armageddon scene where the dance of the Devil takes place]. As Angle Eyes rides onto the property the boy stops the donkey and gets off the donkey to go into the house the donkey then continues alone around his circle a distance of about 13 steps and then stops. When the donkey (burrow) stops the two poles of rigging form exactly an upsidedown cross within the rock circle [the two poles in the scene have been enlarged, lengthened (by the movie design set) and by the end of the scene the donkey now cannot get past the wall causing the donkey to stop and creating the upsidedown cross image in the circle]. Angel Eyes as he rides into the property *takes a shortcut and rides directly over the rock assortment and unknowingly troddens down a sacred Occult [upsidedown cross] symbol.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Socialism</strong><br />
The two known scenes cut from the 1968 film version released to American theaters are all of scene #11 &#8220;Rich and Lonely&#8221; and the camping by the river portion of scene #22 &#8220;Different Partner, Same Deal&#8221;. The scene &#8220;Rich and Lonely&#8221; begins with yet another upsidedown cross this time it is a dead chicken being held out by Tuco (the legs of the chicken are tied but the wings hang out). Seemingly with the Occult image opening the scene the representation is that Socialism [Communism] is just another of the many tools of manipulation available to the Occult realm. Tuco uses the false promise of money to lure his childhood friends into a trap and certain death knowing all along that they will not survive their ordeal with Blondie. Note: The two scenes are restored to the 2003 DVD version of &#8220;The Good, the Bad and the Ugly&#8221; however it is suspected (by the commentator on the DVD version) that a few more portions were cut from the original 1966 film and have not been restored and could not be restored, they might be lost.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Church</strong><br />
The completely destroyed building of what was once a lovely Church is the last structure encountered just before their entrance into &#8220;Sand Hill&#8221; cemetery. Angle Eyes is not present at the Church his Church and congregation consisted of the abused souls at Batterville concentration camp. The congregants of Batterville remained standing in rows [instead of seated in pews] while the deacons of Batterville took up the offering, the praise band played and Pastor Angel Eyes personally gave the (emergent) sermon especially to Tuco. A building, pews, baptismal fount, fellowship, freedoms and pleasant scenery were unnecessary items in the religion Angel Eyes sought to capitalize in.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Eye</strong><br />
The Occult Eye (Satan&#8217;s dominance) of enlightenment is prevalent throughout the movie in fact almost every character is filmed at one time or another posed with only one eye showing or revealing that each person has a certain level of Satanic enlightenment. Blondie is reviled with the one eye enlightenment as he cleans his pistol in the hotel room just as he is enlightened to the pending attack by Tuco&#8217;s pals. Blondie is further enlightened (shown with only one eye &#8211; a spiritual eye) when leaning against the stagecoach after he has learned the name on the grave of the buried treasure. Both Bill Carson (the solider) and Maria (the prostitute) are shown to have a single eye and actually both have a nearly identical, indistinguishable blue eye. Tuco is shown repeatedly to have one eye usually when he wears the eye patch of Bill Carson.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Pyramid</strong><br />
The Occult pyramid is a structure that is broad at its base yet minimal, selective and very notable at the top. The top of the pyramid has everything and dominates everything while the bottom of the pyramid has nothing and dominates nothing, unless it is given the ability to move up to a higher location within the pyramid. The pyramid is evident in the movie most notably during the encircled Dance of the Devil when Blondie takes his evident place at the top of the pyramid and Angel Eyes and Tuco vie for the left (unfavored) and right side (favored) positions at the bottom of the pyramid. Then after all of the events of the movie when Angel Eyes is dead and Tuco is left stranded again (this time at Sand Hill) Blondie rides off out of Sand Hill and into a new lush Garden of Eden utopia. The final scene and ending of the movie is the rider on a black horse riding across a now capped &#8211; pyramid (the top stone in place) that is etched into the ground mostly visible though somewhat not visible. The movie ends with the ending title &#8220;The End&#8221; and situated between the two words is the &#8216;cap stone&#8217; of the pyramid signifying not the end but a new begging for those who are in and know.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Circle of Dominance</strong><br />
Satan sits enthroned above his circle and watches down upon the events occurring within his circle just as Satan&#8217;s faithful servant Arch Stanton faithfully watched the treasure in the grave next to his. The circle of dominance is prevalent in all occult rituals. The subject whether human or spirit being is summoned into the circle and then once in their sphere of influence is dominated. &#8212; &#8220;Isaiah 40:21-23 Have ye not known? have ye not heard? hath it not been told you from the beginning? have ye not understood from the foundations of the earth? It is He [God Almighty] that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in: That bringeth the princes to nothing; He maketh the judges of the earth as vanity.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Revelation</strong><br />
Angle Eyes once he enters Satan&#8217;s circle of domination for the last and most evident time has the personal revelation that he has been the one deceived. Make no mistake about it Angle Eyes does not represent the ordinary Christian. The ordinary Christians are the poor unfortunate souls in Angel Eyes&#8217; congregation the ones who in this scene are now filling the graves of the mass graveyard at Sand Hill cemetery. Angel Eyes didn&#8217;t submit to the system, any system, neither God&#8217;s nor Satan&#8217;s but instead rode the system, rode upon the beast and rode it to his destruction. &#8211; &#8220;Revelation 17:16 And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the beast [the scarlet coloured beast &#8211; Revelation 17:3], these shall hate the whore [Angel Eyes], and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Dance of the Devil</strong><br />
Once in the circle of domination the dance of the Devil takes place. All of the participants enter the circle and dance. Blondie dances elegantly to his rightful and mostly unchallenged place at the top of the pyramid within the circle. Tuco confused and bewildered wanders a bit in his dance. Angel Eyes enters the circle and has the revelation that he has been deceived [in thinking he was an equal partner with Blondie]. Upon his revelation Angle Eyes begins to dance a new dance. Angle Eyes pirouettes [does a dance move] creating his own small circle of dominance attempting to conjure [within himself] his own ability to emerge from his difficult position and into the position of a fellow enlightened Blondie but in doing so Angle Eyes crosses over Tuco, attempting to place Tuco on his gun hand side but instead places himself on the left [from the audience perspective] the unfavored position in the pyramid [but from the top of the pyramid perspective looking down Tuco is on the left side &#8211; the Occult favored side]. Angle Eyes has unknowingly danced himself into his position a position in front of an already open grave. The shot is fired, in &#8216;Shock and Awe&#8217; a wounded Angle Eyes utters but one stunned word &#8220;Oh&#8221; and falls into his open grave to be finished off by one more firing of a bullet. &#8211; Note: This dance of the Devil has seemingly been taking place since 9-11-2001 when the circle of dominance has been revealed to control almost every aspect of the human condition; war, terrorism, flood, weather, security, finances, food, drugs, crime, clothing, technology and even religion. Also seemingly the Angel Eyes Pastors of America are aware of the dance and just like the Angel Eyes of the movie are desperately dancing in an attempt to circle, cross over and manifest as an enlightened one. Pastor Rick Warrens&#8217; U.N. PEACE initiative, Pastor Chuck Smith Sr. and his public support and declaration that Rick Warren is his good, close and dear friend. Pastor Greg Laurie inviting Rick Warren to give the alter call at his Harvest Crusade. Pastor Skip Heitzig opening his congregation to the known Occultist the Satanist Leonard Sweet. Pastor Mike MacIntosh willingly and knowingly taking part in the 9/11 cover-up and accompanying deception. Dr. John MacArthur recently insisting that he has never had a Christian conversion moment in his life. Dr. John Piper assisting Rick Warren and himself displaying occult symbolism [W]. The SBC staff and community in propagating, persisting and covering-up of the fraudulent and dangerous Occult [war invoking &#8220;Sand Hill&#8221;] agenda of Ergun and Emir Caner, two charlatans who are attempting to portray Islam as dangerous and provoke Christians into a needless, endless and deadly religious war.</p>
<div align="center">
<hr align="center" size="2" width="45%" />
</div>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Caner&#8217;s Comeback Almost Complete &#8211; Will Speak to Students at FBC Jax Pastor&#8217;s Conference &#8211; It was announced to FBC Jax high schoolers and their parents this past Wednesday night that Ergun Caner will be speaking to the high school students at the Pastor&#8217;s Conference on Saturday night, January 29th, 2011<br />
In only seven months since Ergun Caner was removed from his duties as dean of the Liberty Theological Seminary, his rise back to SBC prominence is almost complete &#8211; with a little bit of help from his friend Mac Brunson and the high schoolers of FBC Jacksonville. It was announced to FBC Jax high schoolers and their parents this past Wednesday night that Ergun Caner will be speaking to the high school students at the Pastor&#8217;s Conference on Saturday night, January 29th. I assume this is why Ergun Caner&#8217;s picture and bio appear at the Pastor&#8217;s Conference website although he doesn&#8217;t appear any where in the speaking schedule: he must be the speaker at the 7:00 pm &#8220;Student Conference&#8221; on the conference agenda, for which there is no specific speaker listed. If he is the speaker there, why not put his name on the agenda? Why is the cat let out of the bag only a few weeks prior to the conference? Pretty amazing that in just 7 months since his removal as President of the Liberty Theological Seminary over his 9 years of telling fibs in pulpits all over America &#8211; exaggerations of his testimony including his growing up in Turkey, learning of American culture through watching American TV shows while living in Turkey, how he was trained in Jihad &#8211; all false &#8211; that Ergun Caner is now given a platform to speak to high schoolers and presumably seminary students at the 2011 FBC Jax Pastor&#8217;s Conference. &#8230; This rapid return of Caner to SBC prominence perhaps says just as much about the state of evangelical Christianity as did our eagerness to lap up his stories for nine years and roll in the aisles at his racial and gender stereotype jokes. The lesson is if you can tell a good yarn, make people laugh, have superior oratory skills and can draw a crowd and generate revenue &#8211; you will be in high demand. It is about the dollar, and who are your friends. Caner is a co-author with Brunson, and Vines is the one who helped him to fame in 2001 when he brought him to FBC Jax. Neither can afford to let Caner fail. <a title="fbcjaxwatchdog.blogspot.com" href="http://fbcjaxwatchdog.blogspot.com/2011/01/caners-comeback-almost-complete-will.html" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<div align="center">
<hr align="center" size="2" width="45%" />
</div>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Armageddon</strong><br />
A future Biblical scenario [possibly Revelation 20:8-9] where the armies of the earth gather to do war in the Middle-East including the valley of Megiddo a location in the hills &#8220;Sand Hill&#8221; of Israel. In the Occult scenario Armageddon can&#8217;t happen soon enough, hoping to destroy much of the population and overtake the planet for themselves. However the Biblical depiction of the battle of Armageddon more likely occurs during the future Kingdom Reign of Nations at the end of the Millennial reign of Jesus Christ when Nations go to war against God.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>No bullets</strong><br />
Tuco unknowingly enters the dance of the Devil unarmed, the bullets having been removed from his revolver the night before by Blondie. In his movie Sergio Leone gives us a complete wide-angle view of both Blondie and Tuco drawing their guns against Angle Eyes but in the next view of Tuco [a narrow camera view] it is unclear whether a determined Tuco has begun to fire on Blondie in an attempt to gain the treasure all for himself. Tuco is pulling the trigger of an unloaded weapon a weapon that might be pointed at Blondie [we don&#8217;t have a wide-angle view to know for certain] but from the reaction of Tuco it seems that it was. Clearly the Occult plan is to reduce as many factions as possible in reducing the global population and clearly the plan is to leave whatever fraction of a faction is left unarmed, severely restricted (hands tied) and obedient to the Occult. Tuco is allowed to live, momentarily and as is seen in the movie only if Tuco is willing to run back into the circle of domination something that Tuco willingly does as he runs back into the circle, with hands tied while kicking and shouting but in the circle none the less. That&#8217;s the movie however and in reality Tuco [Islam] is not unarmed and in fact is being overly armed especially since 9-11-2001 when the neck of Islam was again figuratively placed in a noose only to be again removed and this time mistakenly armed and equipped with enough bullets and ability to take on Blondie. We will look at this in more detail in our coming study of the 10 [Regional] Kingdoms where in the Bible [Daniel 7:24] three of the 10 Kings feel that they are the rightful rulers and challenge the eventual Antichrist but are swiftly and deliberately dealt with and removed from their authority by the coming Antichrist. Who the three Kings are who challenge the coming Antichrist is unknown, could it be Islam, could it be anyone else?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Occult Timeline</strong><br />
The Occult seemingly has an alphabetical timeline assigned to America specifically and possibly the End Times in generally. At the founding of America with the Revolution War the Occult alphabet seemed to be near the beginning using the early letters of the alphabet often the letter B in words, codes and families. The Blair, Brown and Bush families were all significant families on both sides of the Atlantic in England and in the American Colonies and much of the early Revolutionary War activities took place in the city of Boston, Massachusetts i.e. the Boston Tea Party on December 16, 1773 by the Freemason Lodge St. Andrew&#8217;s Lodge in Boston [http://meta-religion.com/Secret_societies/Groups/Masonry/masonic_myths_of_the_founding_fa.htm]. With the events of the American Civil War the Occult society had felt that it had advanced enough to use the letter K i.e. KKK and in the sport of baseball a product of the Civil War, baseball scoring records a pitcher&#8217;s domination over a batter with a K as a symbol for a strikeout. Today we are nearing the end of alphabet with the letters V, W and X being used more and more and generation Y is often dubbed as the current teenage generation. Though we are not yet at the end of the Occult alphabet timeline [designed end of the American empire] we could be getting close with only the letters Y and Z left to be used. We are going to study End Times a bit more thoroughly and in short what is going to be attempted is a study of the obvious [the British Throne] and the not so obvious [other possibilities] suspecting that the actual End Time events would probably be a combination of the obvious and of the not so obvious. For instance the emerging Global Kingdom is a &#8220;revised&#8221; Roman Empire &#8211; but how revised? Revised enough for the throne to originate not in Rome but in England [probably], revised enough for the throne to originate in America [possibly] or revived enough for the throne to originate in Arabia [possibly]. One thing is for certain the End Time events are not set to the point of their being unchangeable.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Tuco 2</strong><br />
Tuco makes his appearance in the movie and like Blondie is heard from before he is seen by the guns of Tuco firing. Tuco bursts into view in the movie by literally bursting through a plate glass window. Tuco is holding a gun in one hand and a half eaten leg of lamb with a bottle of whiskey in the other. Tuco is leaving the scene without paying for his meal. Tuco is a thief that has taken from the shepherds flock.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Blondie 2</strong><br />
Blondie is himself a trinty of personalities. Blondie as the &#8220;Man with no name&#8221; is a type of the mythical but real Satan. Blondie as Judas is a type of a diabolical personality who cannot be trusted. Blondie as Blondie is a type of person who is in control and in charge of both himself and his situation.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Angel Eyes 2</strong><br />
Angel Eyes is first presented in the movie in clear detail with the sky of heaven as his background. What Angel Eyes could have been if he had lived up to his own potential. A friend too many, a leader, an example and a divine accomplishment both in this life and in the life to come. Instead Angel Eyes lived not to his best abilities but to his worst abilities, his worst greed and his worst compassions. In the end Angel Eyes is standing in Sand Hill graveyard surrounded by the graves of the men who were the very congregants of his church, yet he is unphased by it all, unphased that is until the reality of his own world comes violently and suddenly crashing down upon him.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Summary</strong><br />
Hymn: Where you There? Were you there when they crucified my Lord? Were you there when they crucified my Lord? Oh, sometimes it causes me to tremble, tremble, tremble. Were you there when they crucified my Lord? Were you there when they nailed him to the tree? Were you there when they nailed him to the tree? Oh, sometimes it causes me to tremble, tremble, tremble. Were you there when they nailed him to the tree? Were you there when they laid him in the tomb? Were you there when they laid him in the tomb? Oh, sometimes it causes me to tremble, tremble, tremble. Were you there when they laid him in the tomb? Were you there when God raised him from the tomb? Were you there when God raised him from the tomb? Oh, sometimes it causes me to tremble, tremble, tremble. **Were you there when God raised him from the tomb? Source: <a href="http://www.lutheran-hymnal.com/lyrics/lw505.htm" target="_blank">lutheran-hymnal.com/lyrics/lw505.htm</a> &#8212; Where you there [when they Glorified my Lord]? &#8230; It makes me to WONDER, Wonder, wonder! [The hymn uses the older English word &#8216;tremble&#8217; but the word &#8216;wonder&#8217; is a good or better modern equivalent.] The Christian hymn is asking the question &#8220;Were you there?&#8221; at the cross of Jesus Christ, asking not in an accusing way as in looking for one who had nailed our Savior to the cross but instead asking in a pilgrim way. It is imperative that each Christian make the pilgrimage to the cross of our savior the Lord Jesus Christ. The Prophets of Judah made the trip (Isaiah 53), the Kings of Israel made the trip (King David &#8211; Psalm 22). The three wise men from afar made the trip (Matthew 2) and the peasant girl Mary also made the trip (John 19:26). Fishermen and theologians, disciples and doubters have all made the trip to the cross. Those who have been to the cross, those who have made the pilgrimage to the glorification of our Savior have been able to reflect on the glorious and significant sacrifice that God in His love for us provided for us. The hymn is asking the question because having been to the cross it is then impossible to continue to live our lives in the same selfish and disrespectful ways in which we have previously lived. Have you been to the cross of Jesus Christ &#8230; It makes me WONDER, Wonder, wonder &#8230;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Conclusion</strong><br />
The movie &#8220;The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly&#8221; begins in the opening credits in the midst of an ongoing battle, a large battle is taking place, it is an unseen battle it is the battle of the spiritual realm. According to the opening credits it is both colorful and chaotic it is both stunning and terrifying. We are not simply viewers in this unseen battle we are all participants either willingly or unwillingly. The spiritual war has swept into our country, into our city and it has leveled every block in our neighborhood. We have a choice though, we can either beg for mercy in a harsh war like the owner of the hotel had chosen to do or we can live in faith. We can live in faith, in hope and in love by keeping a war that has come so close to us, to our very doorstep, keeping that war as far away from our heart as possible by knowing that God in Heaven as already prepared a place for us and in that place we won&#8217;t be disappointed.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">by David Anson Brown</p>
<div align="center">
<hr align="center" size="2" width="45%" />
</div>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Chuck Missler &amp; Council for National Policy Warning-Part 1 (Mp3)<br />
Comments: Blaine says &#8211; January 26, 2011 at 5:08 pm Did you bother to listen to the teaching? or did you just commenting after seeing the title? I have listened to a lot of Chuck&#8217;s teaching. My favorite is The Return of The Nephilims. However, though I think Chuck has some good teachings, his connections are still questionable. Scott has brought up some interesting points which he backs up with prove. A man who calls himself a follower of the Lord Jesus Christ has no business yoking up with the people and wicked organizations Chuck is yoked up with. The bible tell us to come out from among them, be separate, and touch not the unclean thing. Then will I receive you, says the Lord. A believer cannot be feasting at the Lord&#8217;s table while in communion with devils&#8230; can&#8217;t have it both ways. I know many of us have had loads of respect for Chuck Missler because of the teaching he has put out, but the truth is the truth! I&#8217;ll rather side with the truth than blindly follow a man when he&#8217;s exposed by the light of the truth. <a title="contendingfortruth.com" href="http://www.contendingfortruth.com/?p=2523" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Chuck Missler &amp; Council for National Policy Warning-Part 2 (Mp3)<br />
Comments: Nola says &#8211; January 25, 2011 at 3:36 pm I thank God you have exposed Chuck Missler. I had been so impressed with his teachings that I had purchased at least $400.00 worth of his teachings. I was actually planning to get a library of all his bible DVDs, which (after listening to your teaching) I WILL NOT. God bless you and thank you. &#8230; Elizabeth says: January 27, 2011 at 3:26 am Dear Scott, I shouldn&#8217;t be surprised, but I continue to marvel at how clever and embedded, and sly and transformed into &#8220;light&#8221; these men and women are. They say all the right things, they know all the right people, they show well in our conferences and seminars and churches. &#8220;Good words and fair speeches&#8221;, deceiving &#8220;the heart of the simple&#8221;. We need to STOP being simple, dear children of God! These wolves and goats are filling our ranks and most seem to have no idea. Thank you, Scott, for your diligence and willingness to present the truth as you uncover it. We are listening&#8230;. Blessings of comfort and strength in the Lord, Elizabeth <a title="contendingfortruth.com" href="http://www.contendingfortruth.com/?p=2517" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Multiple Dimensions &#8211; Exotica: Alien Genesis &#8211; Randy Maugans with Nigel Kerner, Dr. Andrew Silverman, Professor John Biggerstaff &#8211; wide-ranging [mostly secular] discussion on the phenomena of alien abduction and the ET agenda {Note: The 1966 Occult movie &#8220;The Good, the Bad and the Ugly&#8221; introduced the world to an Occult Timeline through a series of pre-determined wars and events however that was decades ago and now the Occult is busy (very busy) introducing the world to their version of a multi-dimensional Occult Universe. An Occult universe of Aliens, UFO&#8217;s, Nephilim, fallen angels, demonic beings, magical and mythical beings of all kinds.} (Mp3)<br />
Part 1 of 2 shows: Nigel Kerner, author of &#8220;The Song of the Greys&#8221; and &#8220;Grey Aliens and the Harvesting of Souls&#8221;, returns with his colleagues to conclude the wide-ranging [mostly secular] discussion on the phenomena of alien abduction and the ET agenda to genetically and technologically re-engineer humanity. You say you want a de-volution&#8230;? <a title="exotica-radio.com" href="http://exotica-radio.com/podcast/alien-genesis.html" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Sweetly Broken [at the cross] &#8211; (Youtube)<br />
By Jeremy Riddle &#8211; Sweetly Broken &#8211; Christian Music. <a title="youtube.com" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyJuKHvoPGc" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Blessed be the Name (Youtube)<br />
By Matt Redman &#8211; Blessed Be Your Name &#8211; Christian Music. <a title="youtube.com" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mZH9T9XNVU" target="_blank">[article link]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to The Jesus Realm blog</title>
		<link>http://the-jesus-realm.com/wordpress/2012/12/23/welcome-to-the-jesus-realm-blog/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Anson Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 13:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[David Anson Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Jesus Realm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-jesus-realm.com/wordpress/?p=3</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[During the coming year 2013 the Basic Christian/Jesus Realm Ministry is going to transition from the Basic Christian material and website to the new website The-Jesus-Realm.com The ministry is going to try to accomplish the following 3 objectives Write a Jesus Realm Devotional regarding the Kingdom of Jesus Christ that will eventually be published as&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">During the coming year 2013 the Basic Christian/Jesus Realm Ministry is going to transition from the Basic Christian material and website to the new website The-Jesus-Realm.com</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;"><strong>The ministry is going to try to accomplish the following 3 objectives</strong></p>
<ol>
<li class="MsoNormal">Write a Jesus Realm Devotional regarding the Kingdom of Jesus Christ that will eventually be published as a Daily Devotional.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Continue to provide some links to topics, resources and information from other ministries.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Follow (live blog if possible) the emerging World Court System – more on this later.<br />
Note: historically governments fluctuate between periods of war and courts and usually after every prolonged period of war there is a prolonged period of court activity i.e. the Vietnam War followed by the Watergate Scandal and hearings lasting from June 17, 1972 &#8211; August 9, 1974.</li>
</ol>
<p class="MsoNormal">Have a Blessed and constructive New Year, a New Year that finds us all productive and growing in the grace, maturity and prayers of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">God bless everyone,<br />
David Anson Brown</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
